Brady6
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 15,687
- Reaction score
- 5,684
1) I did not say that helping the team was limited to one game.
MG – I’m not saying that is what you said and I apologies if that was the implication of what I wrote. What I meant is you appear to want the best player at the end of Aug to make the final roster. I’m suggesting that is not always the case some players have to be retained based on their potential for what they could be.
2) Salas is poor example in that he was useless to us, then and now.
Salas is actually a great example as we protected him, but when were in crunch for a roster spot because of WR/TE injuries we placed him back on the practice squad and the result of that was us losing a potentially impactful player, because someone else stepped in and took advantage of our circumstances.
3) Forston was an OK and inexpensive backup DT.
We don’t really know what Fortson is yet; he played in one game last season for next to no snaps; he was kept because he was considered a high upside player that dropped out of the draft because of injuries and motivation concerns. He could be a future starter, he could be the next Vince Wilfork, or he could never take a snap in the NFL, but Belichick felt he was worthy of protecting.
4) I did not favor cutting Warren. We would have had a better team with Warren on the roster.
We would have been a better team with Warren in 2012; long term we wouldn’t have been though, so the question had to be asked is Warren going to make the team that much better now to justify weakening it in future years and Belichick did not feel that way.
5) Belichick will indeed play with the "bottom" of the 53 man roster a lot throughout the season, especially in the first couple of weeks.
Agreed; he will cut veterans to avoid paying guaranteed contracts, he will stash players till a certain week when he feels more comfortable with them being placed on the practice squad, and all the other strategic moves he generally makes.
6) There are many choices at DE and DT. Buchanan may or may not be one of the best ones.
Buchanan might not be the best one on Aug 31st but he certainly has more talent, a stronger college resume and a far higher ceiling than Francis, Grissom, and even Cunningham or Benard, the question is more can one of those players I listed make the team that much better now to justify losing a potentially impactful player in the future? I honestly would cut any of them over Buchanan; but that’s just me.











