- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 17,015
- Reaction score
- 31,808
Well, this was a pretty provocative headline, but a pretty fair assessment of the state of our defense.
We have a truly AWESOME starting 5 secondary, with every starter in our nickel D either elite (Gonzo) or plus player in the group. Byard and Woodson are the best S duo we've had since Chung and McCourty had their best years together. But the fact remains we need to draft Byard's replacement next year and probably by the end of the 2nd day.
The 2nd level of the defense is clearly the weakest area, but it isn't bad. It just doesn't stand out. It's not great at anything, but it is not bad either. Whether it's by FA or the draft, we need to get better and younger at LB, especially at ILB. This year's group will benefit from the strength we have on the DL and secondary, so we have a chance to once again be a top 10 defense in the league. But MG is correct. Right now I would be very happy if our first pick next season is the best interior LB available when we pick.
The DL looks good both in the starter and the depth. The only thing lacking IMHO is that 360lb NT should we want to go to an odd configuration for whatever reason. Baremore was good last season. I'm hoping he will be even better in his 2nd season after the blood clots. We don't have what anyone would call a "dominant" edge rusher, but we have improved the strength of our edge setting players AND have some interesting pieces to watch like Ponder, Swinson, Jacas to watch compete for meaningful snaps behind Landry and Jones. I like the looks of this DL to be at LEAST as good as last season, and perhaps a bit better.
6 weeks until camp and that's a long time. It's time enough to add at least 3-4 more veteran FA's whose names we know, including at least 1 more LB
We have a truly AWESOME starting 5 secondary, with every starter in our nickel D either elite (Gonzo) or plus player in the group. Byard and Woodson are the best S duo we've had since Chung and McCourty had their best years together. But the fact remains we need to draft Byard's replacement next year and probably by the end of the 2nd day.
The 2nd level of the defense is clearly the weakest area, but it isn't bad. It just doesn't stand out. It's not great at anything, but it is not bad either. Whether it's by FA or the draft, we need to get better and younger at LB, especially at ILB. This year's group will benefit from the strength we have on the DL and secondary, so we have a chance to once again be a top 10 defense in the league. But MG is correct. Right now I would be very happy if our first pick next season is the best interior LB available when we pick.
The DL looks good both in the starter and the depth. The only thing lacking IMHO is that 360lb NT should we want to go to an odd configuration for whatever reason. Baremore was good last season. I'm hoping he will be even better in his 2nd season after the blood clots. We don't have what anyone would call a "dominant" edge rusher, but we have improved the strength of our edge setting players AND have some interesting pieces to watch like Ponder, Swinson, Jacas to watch compete for meaningful snaps behind Landry and Jones. I like the looks of this DL to be at LEAST as good as last season, and perhaps a bit better.
6 weeks until camp and that's a long time. It's time enough to add at least 3-4 more veteran FA's whose names we know, including at least 1 more LB











