- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 30,759
- Reaction score
- 37,993
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I don’t agree.Metcalf would have been 10x worse than Harry in our offense
I don’t agree.
He’s a vertical threat that opens the field for guys like Edelman to work.
Right now, Harry’s best offense are gadget plays out of the backfield.
Hmm seemed to work well in our offense for Randy Moss, Josh Gordon, etc...Metcalf had to wait forever to be drafted because he can’t run routes. To think he’d magically open up our offense running in a straight line isn’t realistic.
Not sure that’s a great comparison. Brady said Moss is the smartest reciever he’s ever played with. Gordon is known for being a smart guy himself.Hmm seemed to work well in our offense for Randy Moss, Josh Gordon, etc...
Doesn’t seem to be working now.
Hmm seemed to work well in our offense for Randy Moss, Josh Gordon, etc...
Doesn’t seem to be working now.
Seahawks missing a banner there?
Gordon and smarts don’t go hand in hand so I don’t see what you’re getting at.Not sure that’s a great comparison. Brady said Moss is the smartest reciever he’s ever played with. Gordon is known for being a smart guy himself.
There’s a difference between being book smart and a drug addict.Gordon and smarts don’t go hand in hand so I don’t see what you’re getting at.
Moss obviously was incredible, but let’s not act like go routes weren’t his best assest in the route tree.
I’m pretty seriously that I would’ve taken Metcalf over Harry. Yes. Very serious.You can’t be serious
Josh Gordon isn’t book smart. I’m not sure where you’re getting that from. He barely picked up the playbook in his time here and his offense consisted primarily of slants and gos...but, it worked for awhile while he was here.There’s a difference between being book smart and a drug addict.
But would you take the SB 53 banner over a potential SB 54, 55, 56, etc banner with Jimmy G? Thats the real questionMeh, I’ll take the Super Bowl 53 banner over Jimmy G any day.
I’ll always take the sure thing over the hypothetical.But would you take the SB 53 banner over a potential SB 54, 55, 56, etc banner with Jimmy G? Thats the real question
Many people here said he was too old lolI like this Sanders guy. Imagine if we had an opportunity to get a guy like that?
You’re grossly underestimating how difficult it is to win a Super Bowl if that’s a serious question.But would you take the SB 53 banner over a potential SB 54, 55, 56, etc banner with Jimmy G? Thats the real question