This is not a "test", just an exercise. Here are three potential OLBs for the Pats available in this draft. All are within a few lbs and within an inch or so of BB's nominal height/weight requirements. In no particular order:
- one is a guy who's received only nominal respect from analysts and is now projected to go in the 3rd
- one is considered a potential "elite" pass-rusher who we may have to trade up in the 1st to get
- one is often, but not unanimously, evaluated as a potentially very good pass rusher and decent all around player who is now projected to go in the late 1st, but possibly the early 2nd
Without looking anything up (NO CHEATING!)...
(1) pick which one you'd draft where based on the numbers below and the projections above
(2) choose which one would appear to present the best value
(3) finally, try to guess who's who
The first grid below is obviously their Combine numbers.
The second grid represents their average annual production for years in which they started.
...........speed....1st-step.......upper-str...lower-str.....footwork....agility
Player.....40-yd.....10-yd....VERT...Bench.....Broad Jump...20-Shuttle...3-cone
A ..........4.62......1.61....34.0"....22..........9'08"........4.40 ......7.13
B ..........4.68......1.59....31.0"....NA..........9'07"........4.65 ......7.34
C ..........4.68......1.66....33.5"....23..........9'04"........4.32.......6.69
A -------- 52 TT - 19 TFL - 11.0 sk - 12 QBH -- 3 PD -- 6 FF
B -------- 46 TT - 12 TFL -- 6.5 sk - 13 QBH -- 5 PD -- 2 FF
C -------- 65 TT - 15 TFL -- 9.0 sk - 10 QBH -- 3 PD -- 4 FF
I fully agree that tape means way more than these numbers. I'm only presenting this as an exercise to see how people MAY make distinctions based on numbers alone. Of course, for those of you who feel you have accurately guessed who these players are, you may certainly factor what else you know about them into your choices.
I'll reveal the identities Monday afternoon.
- one is a guy who's received only nominal respect from analysts and is now projected to go in the 3rd
- one is considered a potential "elite" pass-rusher who we may have to trade up in the 1st to get
- one is often, but not unanimously, evaluated as a potentially very good pass rusher and decent all around player who is now projected to go in the late 1st, but possibly the early 2nd
Without looking anything up (NO CHEATING!)...
(1) pick which one you'd draft where based on the numbers below and the projections above
(2) choose which one would appear to present the best value
(3) finally, try to guess who's who
The first grid below is obviously their Combine numbers.
The second grid represents their average annual production for years in which they started.
...........speed....1st-step.......upper-str...lower-str.....footwork....agility
Player.....40-yd.....10-yd....VERT...Bench.....Broad Jump...20-Shuttle...3-cone
A ..........4.62......1.61....34.0"....22..........9'08"........4.40 ......7.13
B ..........4.68......1.59....31.0"....NA..........9'07"........4.65 ......7.34
C ..........4.68......1.66....33.5"....23..........9'04"........4.32.......6.69
A -------- 52 TT - 19 TFL - 11.0 sk - 12 QBH -- 3 PD -- 6 FF
B -------- 46 TT - 12 TFL -- 6.5 sk - 13 QBH -- 5 PD -- 2 FF
C -------- 65 TT - 15 TFL -- 9.0 sk - 10 QBH -- 3 PD -- 4 FF
I fully agree that tape means way more than these numbers. I'm only presenting this as an exercise to see how people MAY make distinctions based on numbers alone. Of course, for those of you who feel you have accurately guessed who these players are, you may certainly factor what else you know about them into your choices.
I'll reveal the identities Monday afternoon.