Love The Drake
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 28,325
- Reaction score
- 26,946
Maye, Vrabel and a blue chip coaching staff.
Rather have Metcalf or Higgins.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Maye, Vrabel and a blue chip coaching staff.
Sure, get an all-pro in trade! ROFLIf a situation arose where rham was involved in a trade to aquire a game changer on defense you wouldn't entertain it?
Of course. we are. Almost everyone would agree that we will draft an LT anywhere from the bottom of the first through the 3rd where we have two picks.We are definitely drafting a LT
If Eagles add Myles Garrett, hand them the Lombardi trophy and forget the seasonI would love to add Williams and Baun.
If Eagles add Myles Garrett, hand the the Lombardi trophy and forget the season
Not if we sign a top starting LT in free agencyAt this point, whatever spot they get him at, they now HAVE to get him.
That would be preferable. But, they are dropping like flies from being available. Even if we do get Stanley, we'll still need to find a truly solid young replacement for him within no more than 3 years and have them ready to step in (and that's if Stanley manages to stay healthy in that time). I do know this, we cannot have another Flustercluck of an OL like we had last year. I even looked back on scouting reports on Wallace, and most had RG as his best NFL position.Not if we sign a top starting LT in free agency
ROFLI don't understand why Jackson would sign a 3 year deal to play for a team that's shopping it's starting QB (and with no serious QB in the pipeline), and possibly be a FA when he's 29/30, when he could have gotten a 5 year deal from the Patriots and protect the blindside of a young and probable Franchise QB.
DPOY not just a big name.Getting big name player’s doesn’t guarantee anything.
If he told them to screw last year what’s changed? He’s not going to come here. Metcalf is a better bet even though he said out loud what a lot of these guys are thinking, the weather sucks.
Sure, the cost of living is much, much higher in LA than in Boston? Really?My In-Laws and 3 of our kids live in California (my wife's originally from there), and the cost of living there and California's taxes and misc. fees and surcharges are as bad, if not worse than MA.
Go argue with someone else. Not in the mood.Sure, the cost of living is much, much higher in LA than in Boston? Really?
With the FA targets all drying up at LTOf course. we are. Almost everyone would agree that we will draft an LT anywhere from the bottom of the first through the 3rd where we have two picks.
========
Oh, you mean that we will draft an LT in the TOP TEN. That would mean the serious failure to sign a top starting LT in free agency.
=====
But, yes, if we fail in free agency, I could see us draft two LT's, one in the first and another in the 2nd or 3rd.
Even we sign a top OT who can start at LT or at RT, then I could see us draft a LT in the top ten, hopefully after trading down a bit.
We definitely need to address Center somewhere in the draft.With the FA targets all drying up at LT
Looks like then draft is where we will have to man that position
Yes I meant first round and think multiple rounds at G and possible C to round off the line
As I recall, we had trouble trading into the first for one of the 8 top OT's. It was rumored that we were willing to give at least what you suggest.Josh conerly could be the steal of the draft . I am okay with them trading up and giving a 3rd rounder and possibly additional 4th next year to trade to say 25 or 26 where he might be available
What happened to strange being extended to a 3-year contract to be our starting center? But sure, if a center is BPA available then we will draft him.We definitely need to address Center somewhere in the draft.
I don't want either Deebo or Aiyuk, both damaged goods that 49ers are begging to get rid of.
Stop looking at names.
| 154 | 7K |
| 13 | 617 |
| 13 | 427 |
| 7 | 339 |
| 9 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











