upstater1
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 26,626
- Reaction score
- 16,901
How did they benefit from the tuck rule when they lost a game to the tuck rule, which changed the entire seeding for the playoffs? If there was no tuck rule, they have a better won loss record, and higher seeding.Yes. I have a clue about the Patriots. They have benefited from a lot of questionable calls in big situations. Same as everyone else that has played in big games. The tuck rule. The Jesse James catch. The Chris Jones roughing. I didn't say the calls were wrong. Just that they were questionable calls that went the Patriots way. And certainly the rest of the league has felt that the Patriots have benefited more than anyone else. So it's kinda funny now to hear you all talk about how the league is rigged suddenly.
Chiefs got way more calls in the game you referenced.
Even on the very same play, Edelman was clearly interfered with.
Jealous fans hated the Patriots so of course they scrutinized every call, yet the Patriots fans can name just as many calls that went against us.
In fact, the most absurd calls in the history of the league.
I can do this all day, but even Collinsworth was laughing at the 2017 Super Bowl when the NFL announced it as going to change the rules just for that one game, and then proceeded to call one catch by the old rule, another catch by the new rule, both against the Patriots. Collinsworth understood how absurd the NFL was.