lancerman
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 9,163
- Reaction score
- 11,131
Check your DM'sCam must have some sweet Linda Holliday nudes.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Check your DM'sCam must have some sweet Linda Holliday nudes.
We had a lot of dead cap space and big contracts this year. That was a direct result of going for it in recent years. Last year we were set up to be a run first team which was ruined by injuries (which happens).1. Okay what does winning the SB have to do with draft and FA decisions from that year hurting us? It doesn't
2. Were the 2018 Patriots a superior team to the 2007, 2010, 2015 or 2017 Patriots because they won the SB and those teams didn't? Would you give the 2018 better odds to beat all those teams? I doubt it. Sometimes a team can win a SB without being super dominant. Not all SB teams are equal. You would think a team that has been to 9 of them would have fans that get that.... again not that it has anything to do with free agency decisions from that year hurting the team
I'm at loss as to why BB keeps going with newton
You said a Sb winning team wasn’t as good as teams that didn’t win sbs. There is no “nuance” in that.I "value the pereption of being good over actually winning". That's what you got out of that? You know we have the GOAT coach right? You know we've had some teams that beat much more talented teams because of that right? Winning and having a good team that is going to be a good starting point for the future are two different things. In regards to winning the SB, the 2018 team did and that's all that matters in that regard. In regards to where we are now and years prior, yes there were missteps that happened in 2018 and some redflags that signaled where we were heading the next two years.
This isn't complicatd stuff. Some people really do struggle deeply with nuance and context
When you discuss a topic, context matters. The 2018 team can be a SB team and there also can be issues that happened that year that caused longterm problems that ultimately contributed to what happened down the road and you don't just ignore them because a SB occurred that year. We didn't win a SB that year because we got rid of Cooks and signed Matthews who got injured and then signed a bunch of other guys in the off season who either retired (Decker) or didn't pan out (Britt) or played a bit and got suspended (Gordon) and then had a similar WR circus the next year. So yes we won the SB that year, we also completely mismanaged the WR room and basically relied on Gronk and Edelman on their last gasps to do it (KC game).We had a lot of dead cap space and big contracts this year. That was a direct result of going for it in recent years. Last year we were set up to be a run first team which was ruined by injuries (which happens).
Who cares if the 2018 wasn’t as good in the regular season as 2007 and some other years. They won the f’n championship. Honestly, the big difference is it was led by a running game and defense which I suppose isn’t as exciting. Complaining about that is... I probably shouldn’t say. We Patriots fans are so spoiled.
We should fire Bill and test out Stidham at HC. We won't really know for sure until he has a full offseason to prepare the team. But it can't be worse can it?Ridiculous. The way i see it we might never see a rebuild here with BB. Cam stinks!
Do you think the team that wins the SB every year is the best team in the NFL? Do you think the 2007 Giants were better than the 2007 Patriots because they went 1-1 with them (the loss being at their homefield and the win being at a neutral site)? Obviously that is preposterous. Not all SB teams are equal, that's just silly logic that nobody reasonable should take seriously. You can clearly have nuance in how much you value SB teams quality. We had 6 teams win SB's, obviously all 6 weren't as good each other. It would be preposterous to suggest otherwise. You can criticize aspects about the makeup of a SB team that led to issues down the road.You said a Sb winning team wasn’t as good as teams that didn’t win sbs. There is no “nuance” in that.
You get my point. The season’s over but bill still wants to throw this guy on the field.We should fire Bill and test out Stidham at HC. We won't really know for sure until he has a full offseason to prepare the team. But it can't be worse can it?
The only logical reason I can see is this:You get my point. The season’s over but bill still wants to throw this guy on the field.
Beat KC in the AFCCG at Arrowhead. One of the top SB runs in the dynasty.“2018 was not a strong year. We won the SB but”... smh.
When you discuss a topic, context matters. The 2018 team can be a SB team and there also can be issues that happened that year that caused longterm problems that ultimately contributed to what happened down the road and you don't just ignore them because a SB occurred that year. We didn't win a SB that year because we got rid of Cooks and signed Matthews who got injured and then signed a bunch of other guys in the off season who either retired (Decker) or didn't pan out (Britt) or played a bit and got suspended (Gordon) and then had a similar WR circus the next year. So yes we won the SB that year, we also completely mismanaged the WR room and basically relied on Gronk and Edelman on their last gasps to do it (KC game).
The problems this year, did not start with this year. They had been years in the making. Our offense had trouble getting going in 2018, it basically took Gronk healing up and getting back to close to his old self and Sony Michel breaking out late (something that he didn't really retain). It looked good for the start of 2019 but sputtered out by week 3 when we played the Jets and you could see some issues and week 4 against the Bills illuminated them and it really was just hard to watch the offense the rest of the year. There was a reason we were desperate and got Sanu. Then this year without Brady the bottom fell out. It's not surprising to see the trajectory of this team's offense if you've been paying attention for the last few years.
Teams are built year over year. Like I said, good drafting from 2008-2013 ultimately set up the SB runs we experienced. Bad drafting and bad off seasons from 2017 to the present are starting to catch up with the team and and manifest in the on field product. It's no surprise that once we started getting helter skelter with the WR position back in 2018 and did it again in 2019 (Thomas, AB, Sanu) that we were in store for problems.
Nobody is complaining about the result of 2018. That is different than pointing out personnel decisions then that carried on to now
We won 3 SB's from that span. The problems didn't start because of sacrafices made in 2014-2017. If anything we did a very admirable job probably having the strongest run towards the end (I would argue the team got progressively strong and peaked in 2016 and 2017). 2018 had clear problems happen in the off season that repeated the next year and the same positional group is still our weak point.Context does matter. Winning a SB is hard and generally means making long term sacrifices.
2014 season, the Pats beat the Seahawks. Seattle hasn’t been back to the SB since and has largely had to rebuild.
2015, Denver beat Carolina, both teams have sucked since
2016, Patriots beat Atlanta. Atlanta has sucked since
2017, Philly beat the Patriots. Philly has sucked since
2018, Patriots beat the Rams. The Rams were mediocre last year, but do look promising
Do you see a pattern?
And who cares if the 2018 Pats had some struggles. They won the f’ing championship over 31 other teams for the third time in 5 years. A high flying passing offense isn’t the be all end all.
Uche looked amazing tonight if you focused on him. Goff kept getting rid of the ball quickly but Uche got lots of fast pressure and influenced a good amount of throws.
Really happy with the rookies this year. I think this could be one of Belichick's best classes. Onwenu, Dugger, Uche, look like future studs. Plus Jennings, Herron, and Bryant all look like they will develop into at least good role players. That's a great haul, even if the TEs and Kicker are complete busts.
Just trying to look at the bright side.
So if cam plays lights out you thinking 7-9?Sure if we want to lock in 6-10.
they won't lose against the Jets so 7-9 is reasonable, but maybe he can earn himself a contract extension with Bill for another year and we will enjoy his great 50 yard pass, 0TD and 1 INT per game performances for another year to end up again at 7-9 or 6-10So if cam plays lights out you thinking 7-9?
The good news is that the charade of a Super Bowl run can finally be put to rest.
The bad news is that the Pats are in no man's land: not in the playoffs, but also not with a top-10 draft pick.