Game Day Thread Official Post Game Thread- Pats beat the Jets

[SlowGettingUp]

Reiss:

 

[SlowGettingUp]

And here's a really good detailed analysis by Lazar of every single sack - one or two of the six you can argue that Jones was partly responsible:

After Further Review: Patriots Offense Needs an Identity For the Stretch Run, and Might've Found it vs. Jets

The Patriots offense needs to stick with what worked on Sunday.

www.patriots.com

 

[Zuma]

Reiss:

View attachment 47534

Ironically if he went 23 of 31 for 246 with 4 throwaways instead of sacks he might have had a touchdown or 2.

 

[Kontradiction]

Here's a frame from the opposite angle. Looks to me like Wilson's left arm is in front of the Jet's player when contact is first made:

View attachment 47532

Other angles…



If we’re being honest with ourselves, both of these should have been flagged. They weren’t, though, and I’m finding it hard to care because it’s the Jets.

 

[TheRainMaker]

This board would be losing their minds if the teams were reversed and the Jets had a block like that.

 

[Sicilian]

Other angles…

View attachment 47535

If we’re being honest with ourselves, both of these should have been flagged. They weren’t, though, and I’m finding it hard to care because it’s the Jets.

The Schooler one is a legit debate and one I hadn't seen before. The one on the right though? That's several frames after contact. Initial contact was not in the back.

 

[TheRainMaker]

The Schooler one is a legit debate and one I hadn't seen before. The one on the right though? That's several frames after contact. Initial contact was not in the back.

Blandino said that doesn’t matter. If you hit in the back after that, it’s illegal.

However, because it was a block from the Patriots, it must be legal.

 

[Kontradiction]

The Schooler one is a legit debate and one I hadn't seen before. The one on the right though? That's several frames after contact. Initial contact was not in the back.

It’s a clear block in the back. It could have, and should have, drawn the flag. But, again, it’s the Jete. **** ‘em.

 

[Palm Beach Pats Fan]

Other angles…

View attachment 47535

If we’re being honest with ourselves, both of these should have been flagged. They weren’t, though, and I’m finding it hard to care because it’s the Jets.

Those frames are well after initial contact, though

If I block you on the left shoulder while you are running at full speed and leaning forward, you are going to spin around clockwise, just like what happened.

 

[Kontradiction]

Those frames are well after initial contact, though

The Schooler one isn’t.

 

[Sicilian]

It’s a clear block in the back. It could have, and should have, drawn the flag. But, again, it’s the Jete. **** ‘em.

I disagree that it's "clear", but it's also not clear that it's NOT a block in the back, so I don't feel all that strongly either way. I agree though, **** 'em.

 

[ivanvamp]

Well.... BB thinks even penalties should be challengeable, even under two minutes, but the league - and presumably other coaches/organizations - has disagreed. Sucks for the Jets, though...since the call on the field was that it was legal, there's NO WAY enough evidence to overturn that.

 

[Palm Beach Pats Fan]

Here's the Schooler block at the frame where first contact was made. Also... from the side. #41.

 

[Real fan 02]

Reiss:

View attachment 47534

Well said, reiss along with Curran are some of the most accurate and dialed in reporters..

 

[Sicilian]

Here's the Schooler block at the frame where first contact was made. Also... from the side. #41.


View attachment 47536

I actually made a mistake on post in response to that originally. The screenshot Kontra posted wasn't Schooler (41), it was Webb (44).

 

[Real fan 02]

This board would be losing their minds if the teams were reversed and the Jets had a block like that.

It's just a good thing the fortunes were turned to our favor... draft picks are showing up big this season.. I have to go back to Hernandez and gronk to think of a season in wich our draft picks played immediate impact roles.. thanks to groh!

 

[Scotty]

I disagree that it's "clear", but it's also not clear that it's NOT a block in the back, so I don't feel all that strongly either way. I agree though, **** 'em.

Just on this , I saw an earlier post where the player that was hit had actually run out of bounds before the hit. If the hit was called as illegal would they have looked at the entire play ??

 

[captain stone]

What the hell is "Gotham City Football Club"? Is Bim Saleh Bim ashamed of being associated with New Jersey?

Don't blame the Patriots for ruining Punky, blame Woody Johnson for drafting him and ordering Bim to make him a team captain.

Neither Punky, nor in my opinion Any of Lance, Fields, Mac or every other QB taken afterwards is good enough to rise above the mis-handling given him by Woody, Douglas & Mr Clean Junior... Talk about doomed from the start..

 

[captain stone]

Some of us have been calling for that look... For quite a while, in fact...

 

[Palm Beach Pats Fan]

OK, one stop shopping here... all three blocks in question at point of first contact