- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 9,018
- Reaction score
- 21,516
But the 3.91m tender was not guaranteed money, so by him playing he would have gotten it
The quote was - a 6 year, $66M deal with $25.5M guaranteed, with a parenthetical saying it's was basically a 5 year, $62M extension on top of the $3.91M.
In reality, there is no way that the contract would have been structured as a nonguaranteed base salary of $3.91M for 2017, then $25.5M in new guaranteed money beginning in 2018. Yates was just trying to put it into perspective and the Patriots thought process. Butler was giving up more in overall average annual value (11M per year versus 12M per year) in order to have his payday now. The 3.91M tender would have been ripped up, and Butler would have gotten something like a $5-$10M signing bonus immediately with escalating base salaries thereafter.
His total guaranteed money over the 6 year time period was $25.5M *inclusive* of the $3.91M RFA tender that would have been torn up. It wouldn't make sense otherwise. Instead he played for $3.91M in unguaranteed money in 2017, and he's getting $30M in new guaranteed money over the next 5 years. That's $4.5M in additional guaranteed money.
Last edited:












