- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 15,618
- Reaction score
- 14,861
So the fact that O'Connell came in "before" Gutierrez is rendered utterly meaningless by the fact that Gutierrez never came in at all, right?
Anyway, that little backup QB dilemma. Everybody at least agree that O'Connell is a lock? Given that he was an ultra-raw prospect who required a complete mechanics makeover, so far so good. He's clearly NOT ready for the #2 role today, but seems to be on track for 2009. Assuming BB agrees, that means he's not necessarily looking for Mr. Right at QB #2, but Mr. Right Now.
Let's say that does point to an FA cut like Harrington or Simms. IF that's the case, then I think the course is clear: drop both of the Matts on cut day. If you're not planning to keep them, then use the slot to protect an extra player during the initial post-cuts flurry while you try to sign a veteran. The Matts' lackluster camp performance also makes it more likely that one or both will still be hanging around available to re-sign if necessary.
Anyway, that little backup QB dilemma. Everybody at least agree that O'Connell is a lock? Given that he was an ultra-raw prospect who required a complete mechanics makeover, so far so good. He's clearly NOT ready for the #2 role today, but seems to be on track for 2009. Assuming BB agrees, that means he's not necessarily looking for Mr. Right at QB #2, but Mr. Right Now.
Let's say that does point to an FA cut like Harrington or Simms. IF that's the case, then I think the course is clear: drop both of the Matts on cut day. If you're not planning to keep them, then use the slot to protect an extra player during the initial post-cuts flurry while you try to sign a veteran. The Matts' lackluster camp performance also makes it more likely that one or both will still be hanging around available to re-sign if necessary.












