PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

NFL suspends four Saints players; Vilma out for one year

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Saints may be in line for a top 10 pick next year

No way do the Saints recover from an offseason of hell bestowed upon them,alot of talent on that team but about as big of a distraction off field as can be possible.

...they dug their grave and are going to be a 6-10 team at best this year.

The NFC South is tough next year but i seriously doubt it. Brees is that good. Something like this can really piss a team off so i wouldn't be suprised if they are all gonna carry a chip on their shoulders.
 
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

How do you know? They interviewed Hargrove back in 2010 and he lied. We know that now because he has admitted it. When he didn't agree to be interviewed this time but submitted a statement admitting to the facts. The other three had their chance to interview with counsel and declined. I'm willing to bet the league has interviewed a number of players who came clean and verified information. I suppose it would make you happier if they handed out that information or gave it to Dee so that some moron talking head former player could out one or more of them as snitches...

Think pherein...use your head. Goodell may be a prick but in this case as with all the in game fining he's trying to change a culture before the day arrives when the number of former players suing the league for not sufficiently protecting them from injury outnumbers the number of current players playing for the league while incessantly whining about suits trying to turn it into flag football.

PS - don't quote me Dee either because he has access to all the information he wants provided he unclogs the fax machine where all the HgH testing data validation is jammed.

Really not sure where your getting this from. Players have constantly said they have not been approached by the NFL. Hardgrove wasn't talked to in 2010, and may 8th issued a statement that their was no bounty on the Farve hits. Where can I find his statement of admitting something ?
Because if he did that his lawyer is a bigger fool than he would be,lol.

Brees, greer, and other players have asked the NFL for any evidence to support SP suspension, and that any payer was paid. They have never even responded to it.


New Orleans Saints, other players react to suspensions - New Orleans Saints Football NFL News - NOLA.com

Scott Shanle: "RT @greggrosenthal: Not one Saints player agreed to speak to NFL during investigation....not true. Get facts straight"

Im very aware of what Godell is doing by covering the NFL's butt legally. But seeing as the Panthers, Bills, and others have admitted to the same player supported bounty program, after the Saints became a big deal. You would think the NFL, who knew this was going on as far as 2006 when they investigated GB, and found they had one in place, would not be so harsh.
This has something to do with player safety and/or the legal ramifications of not finding a scapegoat to show they are Now actively pursuing pay for play, and player supported bounties .
But this mostly is about goodell thinking he was lied to.

Sorry but Hardgrove over Harper makes no sense, only difference is Harper kept his mouth shut.

added later:
I did find this for you, granted they are nil statements
http://www.nola.com/saints/index.ssf/2012/05/new_orleans_saints_actually_mi.html
According to specific evidence released by the league, Fujita pledged significant money to the program; Hargrove admitted to the program and to being an active participant, confided to a player on another team that Vikings quarterback Brett Favre was a bounty target in the 2009 NFC Championship Game and admitted to obstructing the league's investigation into the program in 2010.

Also, the league said Smith helped create and fund the program with former defensive coordinator Gregg Williams; and Vilma helped create and fund the program, and twice pledged $10,000 to any teammate who knocked out former Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner in the 2009 divisional playoff game, and then to any teammate who knocked out Favre in the conference title game.

Vilma released the following statement through a lawyer:
http://content.usatoday.com/communi...ear-for-role-in-bounty-program/1#.T6GqYe3i-pE
"I am shocked and extremely disappointed by the NFL's decision to suspend me for the 2012 season. Commissioner Roger Goodell has refused to share any of the supposed evidence he claims supports this unprecedented punishment.
The reason is clear: I never paid , or intended to pay, $10,000, or any amount of money, to any player for knocking Kurt Warner, Brett Favre or any other player, out of the 2009 divisional playoff game, 2010 NFC Championship Game, or any other game.
I never set out to intentionally hurt any player and never enticed any teammate to intentionally hurt another player.
I also never put any into a bounty pool or helped to create a bounty pool intended to pay out money for injuring other players.
I have always conducted myself in a professional and proud manner. I intend to fight this injustice, to defend my reputation, to stand up for my team and my profession, and to send a clear signal to the commissioner that the process has failed, to the detriment of me, my teammates, the New Orleans Saints and the game."

Ed Werder was just on SportsCenter.
He is at the Saints facility today. He said a Saints source he spoke to said "The leagues findings are exaggerated. In contrast to the leagues contention the Saints bounty program existed for 3 years... It was limited to playoff games in the Superdome against Arizona and Minnesota." The source then went to say, "This whole thing is one big joke. Except for the 2 games in 2009, the rest is a joke. No one has stood up and told the truth."

I hope that now with all the punishments dished out, the Saints start speaking up. I know the organization has taken the silent approach, but with the suspensions given, the players need to tell their side of the story. I really look forward to the players union challenging Goodell's "facts" and "evidence" that all of the stuff we're accused of happened.
 
Last edited:
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

OK, and then he could call in players from all 31 other teams and ask them whether or not they had a play for pay pool in their locker rooms and just cancel the first two weeks of the season...

NO had 27 players rumoured to be involved. Sitting four players half the games and three per game the other half would get NO done and others presumably would be less, or we could do it your way instead...

The way it's going down now, it's like a soldier who can commit an atrocity and get off by saying he/she was just following orders.

There is a difference between participating in a pay for play pool (which is in and of itself against the rules) and being an active participant in and contributor to a bounty program.

Yeah, in one case you get off scot-free.
 
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players


The players had their chance to be interviewed they chose not to accept.

The NFL said no player agreed to be interviewed in person and the NFLPA did not share information from its own investigation.

Four players suspended by NFL for bounties | West Central Tribune | Willmar, Minnesota

It's not really a moral high ground to claim interviews weren't done when the reason they weren't done is because the players wouldn't do them. The players have the right to refuse the interviews, but complaining about a lack of them afterwards doesn't fly.
 
Last edited:
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players


Did you read the whole article pherein or just the headline? Life is all about choices. Hargrove should try his excuse on the IRS some day... They have a motto, ignorance is no excuse. Neither is I took bad advice...

Jeff Pash was on OTL - which is reairing right now - earlier today. Vilma actually asked for a meeting several weeks ago, and the league agreed. Only when they tried to set up a meeting he changed his mind and declined.

The fraud mouthpiece for the union George Attalah was on today too whining about how he regrets that their hasn't been more of a collaboration between the league and the union on the bounty issue... It's not like the League didn't try to achive one - for weeks. The NFLPA claims it conducted it's own investigation only the league hasn't seen or heard a word about it's findings. The league asked for recommendations and input and got nada.

The latest is they are threatening to take their case to court basically arguing due process and the unfairness of Goodell's power. Good luck with that since you're the same morons who just collectively bargained for exactly what you're getting. Traded any change off for the same thing you always do, a little better % in the compensation pool your star members see the lions share of.

I heard a couple of outspoken former players today say this union has sold their health and safety down the river for years to the detriment of rank and file players in order to pad the bank accounts of a small percentage of players at the top of the league. Of course, I've heard that for years. Now they are defending a small minority who participated in a bounty program aimed at potentially ending their peers and fellow union members careers rather than supporting an effort to change culture necessary to have any shot at improving player health and safety. Same deal as the HgH issue and their defense of players caught using performance enhancing drugs. Unions are such a farce.
 
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

The players had their chance to be interviewed they chose not to accept.

It's not really a moral high ground to claim interviews weren't done when the reason they weren't done is because the players wouldn't do them. The players have the right to refuse the interviews, but complaining about a lack of them afterwards doesn't fly.

Well first I have to say I do apologize for keeping this this thread in everyones face by posting. I do understand this is of little importance to some, and even irritating to others. Bountygate,wiretap , and everything else we are being accused of doing has eaten a lot of football time, and we are more sick of the constant news than any other fan could possibly be. So, I am sorry for that.

Dues, I am not sure why I would look for moral ground at all. Im not in any way defending the Saints. I do think its a fans responsibly to support their team completely, and not believe the media, conjecture ,theory, or non evidence that does not support the team, until proven guilty. But not Blindly.

I think you might remember that I actually supported Big Ben side, until he was charged. Then my mind shifted to 50/50. I was proud to do it, but I really can't convict him of something he very stood trial for.
People talk about how the media is out of control, convicts without trial on theory, and by slapping together a 100 sound bites to create a truth, but the real truth is we are the problem.
We are the ones that make up our minds, become statues of thought, unchanging, filtering out all else that does not support the media position.
I call it gossip.

My mind about all of this has been
100% Saints 0% Goodell
80% Saints 20% Goodell
50% Saints 50% Goodell
30% Saints 70% Goodell
50% Saints 50% Goodell
60% Saints 40% Goodell
80% Saints 20% Goodell
I can't change my bias for the Saints as much as I could cut off my left arm. Thats just something I need to figure into my own thinking, and understand it there, and not changing. So, I think you misinterped my meaning,because I did not post it properly.
THe NFLPA instructed those players not to talk to the NFL because of the pending court cases, and yes their will be court cases maybe even supreme court, to protect their position. I truly believe if you were one of those players you would have done exactly what they did.

I also believe one of the problems in this scandal is the NFLPA. I don't see a reason for not meeting with the NFL with NFLPA legal counsel by their side. But that is not what they were told to do.
I was saying that the NFL has not tried to contact anyone else, like greer, harper, porter, Brees, etc who have stated they want to be interviewed and want to see the evidence.
But, it is a good point that the NFLPA might tell them to do the same thing, and that the NFL just threw up their hands and gave up. Ive noticed I write to much,lol.
 
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

True, but would have been nice if godell and the NFL talked or interviewed even one of the Saints players. They never did.

I'm going to disagree. The league reached out to players through counsel and of course the NFLPA. I think Goodell talked to more than enough people here.

You're going to have to live with the fact, just as we did during Spygate, that outside your own region and fan-base, most fans are going to think the Saints got off too easy.

I'm satisfied that the League's punishment of the team was severe enough that "the message has been delivered" that the NFL will not tolerate organized attempts to injure other players. (Personally, I think the Players got off easy, but I accept that in the context of the failure of team and management leadership that allowed this to happen at all.)

Spygate was a newly seated Commissioner's way of telling the League, "if i say I want something done in a certain way, that's how I want it done." In a much more serious manner, a now-seasoned Goodell is sending a message again to his Owners and the Players.
 
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

Did you read the whole article pherein or just the headline? Life is all about choices. Hargrove should try his excuse on the IRS some day... They have a motto, ignorance is no excuse. Neither is I took bad advice...
Im not sure why you say things like this. You really just demeaning me in you own head.
Do you think I read it ?
Hargrove had a bad life, and childhood. Made bad choses with drugs. Saints cleaned him up and gave him a second shot. I think his maturity level is not what it should be at his age. I really don't fault him for struggling with his loyalty to the Saints. The important thing is in the end he comes clean. It wouldn't even surprise me if he is being coherst for only a 8 game suspension. He has nothing else that he can do except football.
I can see both sides. Personally I never seen how looking at something simplistically does anyone any good, until a conviction has occurred.

Interesting thing that some have pointed out is that Gregg Williams is the one providing information to the NFL. He's has everything to lose, and Goodell is in charge of wether he will ever coach again. He won't talk to the media, and has only supplied NFL approved written statements. This is a man that could easily be twisted to fit their position.


Jeff Pash was on OTL - which is reairing right now - earlier today. Vilma actually asked for a meeting several weeks ago, and the league agreed. Only when they tried to set up a meeting he changed his mind and declined.
Yep, thats correct. Vilma has hired legal counsel. The same lawyer that did starsgate.
What is the meaning of gate anyways? lol. Man, watergate really effected every scandal title since.
I see Vilma's innocence as being directly related to how far he takes this legally. Though some think you can not pass goodell,because it a off the field offense, thats just not true.
If the players can show malice, breach of contract, or improper conduct by Goddell, they are allowed to go to court, according to the agreement. And if a judge will not see the case, which I think is unlikely because its great for their career, He can go to the supreme court to fight the antitrust agreement. Which the supreme court struck down before. Im sure the NFL owners do not want that to happen.

The fraud mouthpiece for the union George Attalah was on today too whining about how he regrets that their hasn't been more of a collaboration between the league and the union on the bounty issue... It's not like the League didn't try to achive one - for weeks. The NFLPA claims it conducted it's own investigation only the league hasn't seen or heard a word about it's findings. The league asked for recommendations and input and got nada.

Though Im not happy with the NFLPA, the reason it exist is because of the negligence of the NFL and its owners to deal with its players. They created their own monster. Much like the corrupt unions of the past.
Why would the NFLPA tell the NFL anything? The NFL never released evidence to them from the start either.
NFLPA counsel response to NFL conference call | NOLA.com
New Orleans Saints Bountygate players Jonathan Vilma, Scott Fujita, Anthony Hargrove, Will Smith suspended - NFL News | FOX Sports on MSN

Im not understand were anyone has a view to take Goodell's or the NFLPA side. Their both acting like idiots in my book. Goddell could memo the players with what he has for evidence, and tell them to shut up, or release it, and this story goes away, but he's not.

Because he dosnt have anything, except a few PP slides, couple emails, and couple guys supporting him. Against goodell are, I don't know, 50 players, coaches, etc. I think he knows he's not winning a court case.
Mary Jo Whites statements are usual for counsel, but oddly enough still provide no evidence. In fact why is she speaking up for Goodell's position at all at this time?
Seems and odd thing to do, unless your trying to prevent Vilma from civil/legal action.
I mean what is the purpose of it. He was obviously told her to make these statements.
And her statement come down to this " Oh, believe me and roger, they are guilt"

The NFLPA, I would love to see someone bring them to court for obstructing justice.
They are not helping the situation. The Saints players are caught somewhere in the middle, but really have no option except to listen to the NFLPA.
Its a mess, and mishandled on both ends. IT never should have gotten this far or taken this long.

The latest is they are threatening to take their case to court basically arguing due process and the unfairness of Goodell's power. Good luck with that since you're the same morons who just collectively bargained for exactly what you're getting. Traded any change off for the same thing you always do, a little better % in the compensation pool your star members see the lions share of.

Well, Like I said before. It can be done. There are was to get around the agreement legally. Vilma could even find a way to say the CBA was already violated.
Could Saints appeal bans to Supreme Court? - News from USA TODAY
However the players, who were given three days to appeal, may have significant hurdles to overcome. The collective bargaining agreement signed after last summer’s lockout essentially makes Goodell judge and jury for matters pertaining to the integrity of the game. Since this case technically falls under the umbrella of off-field conduct, the players can’t appeal to anyone but the commissioner per the CBA’s bylaws and may have difficulty getting the case in front of an outside judge.

“The players gave him extremely broad authority,” says Gabe Feldman, director of Tulane’s Sports Law program. “They’d have to show he exhibited bias or had no basis for the punishments, and that he acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner.

“There’s always the possibility the commissioner exceeded his powers, but that’s a difficult claim for the players to make. … They are going to have to overcome the fact that they bargained for a limited appeal right and that somewhere the commissioner violated the terms of the contract.”

Until, that trial is done, godell can't suspend anyone, that could take years, and the supreme court are not NFL supporters..

Supreme Court denies NFL's request for broad antitrust protection
Supreme Court denies NFL's request for broad antitrust protection

I think anyone thinking its not possible is not completely accurate.

I heard a couple of outspoken former players today say this union has sold their health and safety down the river for years to the detriment of rank and file players in order to pad the bank accounts of a small percentage of players at the top of the league. Of course, I've heard that for years. Now they are defending a small minority who participated in a bounty program aimed at potentially ending their peers and fellow union members careers rather than supporting an effort to change culture necessary to have any shot at improving player health and safety. Same deal as the HgH issue and their defense of players caught using performance enhancing drugs. Unions are such a farce
.

Well its is their job. But I agree with you unions are usually not a good thing. But, if the NFL did their job and treated players fairly, like when they know about head injuries, their wouldn't be a union. Its the NFL fault it even exist. I wish people could just tell the truth, cared about each other , and tried to be fair. But thats really not our corporate cutler is it? lol
 
Last edited:
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

I'm going to disagree. The league reached out to players through counsel and of course the NFLPA. I think Goodell talked to more than enough people here.

You're going to have to live with the fact, just as we did during Spygate, that outside your own region and fan-base, most fans are going to think the Saints got off too easy.

I'm satisfied that the League's punishment of the team was severe enough that "the message has been delivered" that the NFL will not tolerate organized attempts to injure other players. (Personally, I think the Players got off easy, but I accept that in the context of the failure of team and management leadership that allowed this to happen at all.)

Spygate was a newly seated Commissioner's way of telling the League, "if i say I want something done in a certain way, that's how I want it done." In a much more serious manner, a now-seasoned Goodell is sending a message again to his Owners and the Players.

Have any of the other teams that Greg Williams coached been given punishments?
Its already known that he instituted this whereever he went so unless the other teams get a similar punishment then its just more hypocrisy from Goodell. Much like the way the Dolphins were told they were fine for spying on the Patriots but then when Goodell went after the Patriots he was reviewing stuff prior to the Dolphins incident.
 
Pherein - You are a great poster and I understand your love for the players on your team. However, blind support of them in light of the evidence that the league has really doesn't help.

The Bills, Panthers, etc, had pools for Interceptions, fumbles, defensive TDs, etc. They did NOT include attempts to hurt others. Well, the Bills program might have while Williams was there, but we don't know.

The players clearly circled the wagons on this to protect themselves from lawsuits and potential legal action. That is why they refused to be interviewed by the NFL. The problem for Fujita, Hargrove, Vilma, and Smith is that whomever blew the whistle on the program is the one that probably gave them the names of the players as well. It's very easy to understand why the league refuses to give out their "evidence" since it would probably lead directly to the identification of the person who blew the whistle.

Another problem for these four players is that is this has a bigger impact. It directly impacts the ongoing lawsuits and any future lawsuits that players might have against the league. In fact, these four can kiss any hope of filing a lawsuit against the league regarding concussions good-bye. Not to mention that player safety was a huge issue during the last CBA and yet, you have players openly trying to injure others. Lends itself to reasonable doubt that the players really care about safety,

One other thing I find surprising is that Vilma supposedly thought he'd get a suspension that was between 2 and 8 games. Why would he expect that if he did nothing wrong? Makes no sense.



Williams, Peyton, and Loomis admitted that the program included bounties for injuries to opposing players. Not to mention the outside marketing guy.. Are you really going to believe that they all lied in some conspiracy against Smith, Vilma, Hargrove, and Fujita. I know you are smarter than that.
 
This is never getting to the Supreme Court pherein. And the suspensions will remain in effect during the process the union has now undertaken, grieving the suspensions to the Special Master based not on guilt or innocence or evidence but based on the premise that the Commissioner doesn't have the authority to preside over these particular violations and even if he did the players claim amnesty for anything they did prior to signing the new CBA. Basically they are attempting to get them off on a technicality because they know based on the evidence that isn't going to happen...

Vilma is such a phoney actor. He feigns shock at his suspension when it was the driving force behind his recent restructure designed to limit the financial repurcussions of what he and the arrogant management team Benson has assembled likely anticipated would be 6-8 game suspensions at most for any of them. The Saints have already paid him the bulk of his contractual money for this season in the form of a signing bonus that could only be recovered if they themselves decided to file a grievance against him - and they aren't going to do that. Just like they aren't going to fire Loomis or Vitt or Payton. They believed all along they could stonewall the whole mess as they did in 2010, only this time there was too much corroberating evidence to matter whether they all just kept their mouthes shut or not...

It's easy to say that Williams is the only source now, the scapegoat. He wasn't the whistleblower and he didn't provide the reams of documentary evidence including a paper trail and a money trail the league already had before this investigation had already produced sufficient evidence to warrant suspending the whole sorry lot of them. Although from here on out he likely can and will be used against them in any court of law they attempt to bamboozle into helping them find some loophole around being accountable for their own actions.

I hear the usual clowns now staking out their look at me ground by opining that while they believe the evidence exists and the parties are guilty as sin gosh, you're talking about taking away serious chunk of a guys ability to earn a living at his craft. The same thing that may have led to his being involved in the whole mess to begin with. Well guess what, that's called consequence and a lot of people who screw up do so in part because they live their entire lives in denial of it's existence...at least where they're concerned. Or in avoidance of it by any means. If they get caught doing something they clearly aren't supposed to be doing their first line of defense is everyone does it or people are making a mountain out of a molehill shortly thereafter followed by the punishment doesn't fit the offense...and/or nobody's perfect and everyone deserves a second or third or whatever chance to figure life out before we actually start being held accountable....

Welcome to the real world. Where Vilma et all will get the opportunity to plead that case because they have the means and opportunity to at their disposal. Has nothing to do with guilt or innocence, though pherein.

This union and it's members have to get over the us vs. them mentality and past the agent driven focus on dollars at the expense of sense... Quit blaming Goodell for things that happened on Tagliabue and Upshaw's watch and start participating in the process he is attempting to undertake because if you don't there won't be any need for a professional football players union in another 20-30 years because the game will have committed suicide because it resisted all efforts to help it save itself. And fans and media who want to absolve destructive behavior and rail against changes implemented to try and make it safer because they ruin their personal enjoyment will have been as complicit as if they handed out the shotguns.
 
Last edited:
I want to see the mountain of evidence they supposedly have. After how poorly they handled spygate they arent handling this any better. I understand that they probably don't want to expose the whistle blower but eventually it's going to come out and right now the league is looking worse and worse. If they really have all this evidence show it, hell show some of it. We were railroaded in 2007 for something that was overblown and I don't want to see another team railroaded for something that was overblown.
 
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

Have any of the other teams that Greg Williams coached been given punishments?
Its already known that he instituted this whereever he went so unless the other teams get a similar punishment then its just more hypocrisy from Goodell. Much like the way the Dolphins were told they were fine for spying on the Patriots but then when Goodell went after the Patriots he was reviewing stuff prior to the Dolphins incident.

Has everyone who ever committed murder been prosecuted and convicted? Oh, then I guess then we shouldn't prosecute anyone...:ugh:

He was in Buffalo a decade ago. Probably 90% of the player on his defense there are out of the game already and the other 10% are playing elsewhere. And good luck finding a paper and money trail after a 8-10 years, even the IRS doesn't make you retain those kind of records. This isn't just some he said he said situation, they have reams of corroborating evidence. Would you have them ignore that because heck, it probably happened somewhere else and we don't have sufficient evidence to punish them, too.

What the Dolphins did was kind of sleezy but it wasn't against any rule or even in technical violation of any memo...

Perhaps you'd prefer Goodell to just cancel the 2012 season as sort of a blanket punishment because on some level everyone has likely violated a rule.

There is an old proverb that says the nail that sticks up gets hammered down. No one ever said it would always be fair. I believe Bill has a saying that underscores all of that, it is what it is.
 
Hopefully, they not only release the evidence supporting the punishments but also include the logic behind the severity. Until then I'll feel conflicted about what the objective of the punishments really were. Does the "time fit the crime" or is it severe to protect the NFL position on player safety?

Whenever there has been an unpopular decision to be made a places I have worked managment has 1) attempted to build consensus by including people affected by the decision and 2) hired an independent consulant to take responsibility for the difficult decision.

It will be interesting to see what happens if/when the players challenge the NFL over the penalties. If it doesn't work out for Roger, he can always say that he tried to reach out to the players to include them in the process, he consulted an expert to advise him and NFL demonstrates a firm stance on player safety issues.

If these penalties were so easy to apply, Roger would have just done it.
 
Two smart guys...

Gabe Feldman?@SportsLawGuy

NFLPA is not using the "it wasn't me" defense yet. This is still the, "you don't get to decide if it was me" argument, w/ 3 prongs.

Andrew Brandt?@adbrandt

NFLPA strategy: stay away from taking a side on Bounty hunters/hunted; collectively unite players against the NFL.

This is why the relationship never changes...even when that leads to a potentially worse scenaios for the majority rank and file players continuing health and safety and ultimately the very existence of the game itself.
 
Re: Huge suspension for Saints players

Well first I have to say I do apologize for keeping this this thread in everyones face by posting. I do understand this is of little importance to some, and even irritating to others. Bountygate,wiretap , and everything else we are being accused of doing has eaten a lot of football time, and we are more sick of the constant news than any other fan could possibly be. So, I am sorry for that.

No need to apologize. Patriots fans understand all this.

Dues, I am not sure why I would look for moral ground at all. Im not in any way defending the Saints. I do think its a fans responsibly to support their team completely, and not believe the media, conjecture ,theory, or non evidence that does not support the team, until proven guilty. But not Blindly.

You and I disagree about a fan's 'responsibility, but that's neither here nor there. The players refused to be interviewed, so there's no onus on the league for that.

I think you might remember that I actually supported Big Ben side, until he was charged. Then my mind shifted to 50/50. I was proud to do it, but I really can't convict him of something he very stood trial for.
People talk about how the media is out of control, convicts without trial on theory, and by slapping together a 100 sound bites to create a truth, but the real truth is we are the problem.
We are the ones that make up our minds, become statues of thought, unchanging, filtering out all else that does not support the media position.
I call it gossip.

Just a couple of things:

1.) I think you'll find that I don't post much against players when it comes to criminal matters. I generally take a "not my business" approach to it.

2.) I sided with the players during the lockout, and am not a knee-jerk defender of the league/owners.

3.) We're not the jury, so we're not required to wait for evidence, ignore anything the judge considers inadmissible, use a reasonable doubt standard or anything else involved in the legal process.

4.) In the case at hand, the NFL thinks it's got the goods and the players (and the NFLPA) are playing jurisdictional games that should have been dealt with in the CBA.

My mind about all of this has been
100% Saints 0% Goodell
80% Saints 20% Goodell
50% Saints 50% Goodell
30% Saints 70% Goodell
50% Saints 50% Goodell
60% Saints 40% Goodell
80% Saints 20% Goodell
I can't change my bias for the Saints as much as I could cut off my left arm. Thats just something I need to figure into my own thinking, and understand it there, and not changing. So, I think you misinterped my meaning,because I did not post it properly.

Unless Goodell got a forced, or false confession, this is 100% Saints. I'm sorry, Pherein, but that's where it is. And this is coming from someone who really, really doesn't like Goodell.
 
Two smart guys...



This is why the relationship never changes...even when that leads to a potentially worse scenaios for the majority rank and file players continuing health and safety and ultimately the very existence of the game itself.

Couldn't agree more....
 
Bernard Pollard has weighed in on the suspensions and he is furious, among other things...

Says you can't take away a mans livlihood just because he lied, we all lie...

Says he won't sue the NFL because he knew what he was getting into, but he won't let his son play the game because it's too dangerous. But you can't change it because if you do no one will pay to watch guys play it. And he thinks it will be gone in 20 or 30 years either way and that's OK with him 'cause he got what he wanted out of it...

And he won't speculate on head injury and Junior's suicide...beyond speculating that there may have been a lot of stuff going on in his life like with domestic issues and ex wives...

Oh, and the players didn't want the game made safer, they wanted better post career insurance. That's what the lockout was all about.

He'd make a great NFLPA player rep. Might even be Executive Committee material.

CBS Audio Player
 
Bernard Pollard has weighed in on the suspensions and he is furious, among other things...

Says you can't take away a mans livlihood just because he lied, we all lie...

Says he won't sue the NFL because he knew what he was getting into, but he won't let his son play the game because it's too dangerous. But you can't change it because if you do no one will pay to watch guys play it. And he thinks it will be gone in 20 or 30 years either way and that's OK with him 'cause he got what he wanted out of it...

And he won't speculate on head injury and Junior's suicide...beyond speculating that there may have been a lot of stuff going on in his life like with domestic issues and ex wives...

Oh, and the players didn't want the game made safer, they wanted better post career insurance. That's what the lockout was all about.

He'd make a great NFLPA player rep. Might even be Executive Committee material.

CBS Audio Player

....advanced stages of CTE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Former Patriots Super Bowl MVP Set to Announce Pick During Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Media Statement on Tuesday 4/21
MORSE: What Will the Patriots Do in the Draft?
MORSE: Patriots Prospects and 30 Visits
Patriots News 04-19, Countdown To Draft Day
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
2 weeks ago
Back
Top