SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Perhaps the organization is telling them there's no interest, so the agent is testing the waters on his own by going public?I am not sure what going public with the trade request means. The Pats were not going to trade N'Keal and this is pressuring them to trade him? Why go public? The Pats have had trade offers and declined?
N'Kela Harry just assured that the Patriots will get 0.00000000 for him in a trade.
There was NO reason for the idiot agent to go public with this.
The Pats were almost certainly going to trade him. Now they will get nothing.
The agent and Harry just screwed the Pats over
How about just the bag..
N'Kela Harry just assured that the Patriots will get 0.00000000 for him in a trade.
There was NO reason for the idiot agent to go public with this.
The Pats were almost certainly going to trade him. Now they will get nothing.
The agent and Harry just screwed the Pats over
But, I am fine with them cutting him today. He sucks. He will go down as a top 10 Pats draft bust of all time, especially given who they passed over to draft him.
The Patriots were already greatly incentivized to trade him without the idiot agent demanding a trade request for his bust of a client. If they trade him they are off the hook for his remaining guaranteed salary.There is every reason in the world for the agent to do this & why should Harry care what we get in return?
The agent has a client who is on the skids, desperately needs a new scene... in order to get him the best chance to succeed, he needs to find a new team before camp... letting the Pats sit on their hands, treating him like a camp body isn't going to do Harry any good...
and yeah, ive seen enough at this point to cut the line and let him loose...
I'm astonished that someone like yourself has confused correlation and causation so badly.
Not to mention your timeline is wrong.
Cam was re-signed before the start of free agency.
Before the start of Free Agency the Pats had 3 WR healthy who had seen more than two dozen snaps.
This idea that BB shouldn't have spent money on Bourne and Agholor when they are nothing like what the Pats had on the roster is ridiculous.
Agholor is an outside receiver. Bourne is a guy who is best from the slot, more like Welker was.
Agholor is a Byrd replacement. Bourne an Edelman replacement. I would think someone who claims to have watched football for as long as you have would understand this.
One would ALSO think that you'd remember that injuries happen. Particularly when your QB hangs you out to dry the way Cam did last year.
Only a complete ##### wouldn't see that adding two WR in FA to strengthen the depth of the roster than about the actual players currently on the roster
I think the Hertz Boston sign kind of disagrees
The Patriots were already greatly incentivized to trade him without the idiot agent demanding a trade request for his bust of a client. If they trade him they are off the hook for his remaining guaranteed salary.
The question is would it be easier for Pats to trade him by operating quietly under the radar OR now that the trade demand has been made, any team that might want him..simply waits until the Pats cut him.
Maybe the trade demand was to force the Pats hand to cut him immediately, as opposed to having to wait for training camp injuries to set in before team gets desperate enough to trade for him.
From the agent's perspective the sooner he gets onto another team (after being cut and claimed) the better his chances of making that team.
I suspect the Pats will cut him within the next few days,