Patriots Local News:

SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Boston Herald


SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com

Patsfans.com


Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: N/A
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
World Champs!
Tom Brady and the Patriots won their sixth championship on Sunday night after a tough defensive battle over the Rams.


Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

My Gut Feel Is That We Won't Emphasize Defense At All

Discussion in 'Patriots Draft Talk' started by mgteich, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:51 PM.

  1. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    28,682
    Likes Received:
    1,989
    Ratings:
    +7,716
    I see this draft (at the the first 7 picks) focused almost totally on offense, filling needs at TE, WR, OL, and perhaps a QB.
    ===============
    I suspect that Belichick will sign at least a couple DL's in free agency. One would be in the DT mix with Pennel, Guy and Butler (and Parry). One would be in the DE mix with Bennett, Simon and Wise (and Rivers, Davis, Kamalu and Harris).

    Adding DL's could happen before the draft (e.g. Shelton), during (via trade) or after. There are plenty of DL's out there.

    Sure, we need depth at LB and DB, but we have lots of prospects already in Jackson (already a starter), Bentley, Sam, Crossen, Dawson, Melifonwu and Brooks.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1

  2. holyredeemer

    holyredeemer 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,644
    Likes Received:
    302
    Ratings:
    +1,373
    I agree. Some solid DL still in FA, not mention what we don’t know that could be available in trade. I wouldn’t be shocked if we went the route you suggest.
     
  3. BaconGrundleCandy

    BaconGrundleCandy Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    May 31, 2016
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    2,867
    Ratings:
    +7,584
    I remember saying this in my thread months ago.

    So much defensive talent teams could just get silly & leave the top tier offensive guys alone for the picking. Bill zigs where everyone else zags type thing.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. captain stone

    captain stone Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    16,028
    Likes Received:
    1,730
    Ratings:
    +7,010
    We absolutely MUST have a top-100-calibre DE from this draft to replace Flowers.
     
  5. pazrul72

    pazrul72 Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    354
    Ratings:
    +1,141
    edit double post
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2019 at 8:56 AM
  6. BelizePats

    BelizePats Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    165
    Ratings:
    +725
    You could be right because all that top tier D talent will leave some players on offense to slide.
    I'm with the Captain on this one. We definitely need some youth on the at the DT position and I'll be pissed if we don't go that route early. It is a clear top 100 need.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. pazrul72

    pazrul72 Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    354
    Ratings:
    +1,141
    Flowers wasn't a top 100 DE, nor was he ready to be a plus starter for two years. Like it or not Bennett is the flowers replacement. Now I agree we need talent there and would not be upset at all with a top pick to groom or even a double dip hoping lightning strikes twice with a late rounder who fills the holes in his game but it's not a MUST level need like WR, TE, and DT. IMO of course.
     
  8. SBLIII

    SBLIII Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    947
    Likes Received:
    315
    Ratings:
    +1,389
    We will rely on JAGs and give Tom some legit weapons probably.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  9. reamer

    reamer Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,931
    Likes Received:
    4,288
    Ratings:
    +13,601
    Hmm. Not sure that I really agree with this take. 101 is close enough to top 100. He flashed immediately but then had an injury in preseason, tried to play through it, and ended up on IR -- I think he was definitely ready to be a full time starter if he'd been healthy. His second season started a little slowly as he returned to form, but he still led the team in sacks and had a monster SB performance.

    Incidentally, we pick at 101 again. That's about the latest I'd want to see some sort of DL, ideally.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  10. SBLIII

    SBLIII Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    947
    Likes Received:
    315
    Ratings:
    +1,389
    A WR in the 1st round is more likely than ever because nobody it seems wants to trade us a decent WR. Now we need to put more draft capital in it.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1

  11. pazrul72

    pazrul72 Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    354
    Ratings:
    +1,141
    I did some quick math in my head, I knew Flowers was round 4 so I went 32 X 3 plus comps and the pats usually pick towards the end of the round so I thought he was closer to 140 then 101. I agree he flashed and I was excited about him but it was more like Wise, hmm there is a nice play let’s see what he grows into, not Wow we got a steal and this guy is gonna be a superstar.

    As for his second season that sounds like a player growing into his role and becoming the guy we saw in his 3rd and 4th season, a monster that just got paid 18m a year. My point wasn’t so much that Flowers wasn’t awesome just that even he took a little time. He wasn’t a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd rounder so if the pats wait until the 4th or 5th and take a guy with holes in his game but could develop into something that’s ok too because we have Bennett for at least this year and likely next as well.

    IMO you can’t use the draft to fill immediate holes, most rookies are not ready and your team gains major long term benefits to have them sit and learn for at least half the year then gradually throw them into the fire...at least until injuries hit and you no longer have a choice. For that reason I would be pretty happy if they did select a top DE to replace Bennett in the next couple years. I just rank that need like safety, or swing tackle, or LB not a NEED like WR or TE for example where I want a double dip at both hoping at least one of the four is a pro bowl caliber player eventually.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1

Share This Page

Search For Links: - CLOSE
For searches with multiple players
add commas (Ex: "Brady, Gronkowski")