Joey007
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,943
- Reaction score
- 20,990
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Good on him for letting Dawson get rid of that horrendous 42 number.Lateral move by Michel imo.
Kinda liked JC Jackson wearing 34 though
I wish rbs were allowed to wear 1-9
Idk, when Bill gave Sony Michel #51 in training camp I wasn’t a big fan. There’s some numbers that just look bizarre on certain players.I think the NFL number rules should be significantly relaxed. I know things are slowly headed in that direction, but it seems to make the most sense the way schools do it, where you just have eligible/ineligible receiver numbers. I suppose one benefit to the NFL way is you get numbers in the 80s/90s being glorified much more than in other sports.
None of it matters anyway except, of course, to me.
Idk, when Bill gave Sony Michel #51 in training camp I wasn’t a big fan. There’s some numbers that just look bizarre on certain players.
Agreed. 26 is pretty tight IMO.I like 26 for Michel. Clinton Portis was an excellent back who wore #26 back in the day.
I like 26 for Michel. Clinton Portis was an excellent back who wore #26 back in the day.