WaterfallJumper
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2009
- Messages
- 8,694
- Reaction score
- 18,714
Super-atrocious.
Then there's the 0-16 Lions and Browns: Super-califragilisticexpial-atrocious.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Super-atrocious.
I feel like there's a little bit of revisionist history going on here. It was a matter of time before Bledsoe lost his job. He didn't fit what they wanted to do, and wasn't exactly setting the world on fire, witness the 19/21 TD to INT ratio in 1999 and 17/13 in 2000. Not to mention the 8-8 record and 5-11. He was trending in the wrong direction, regardless of his contract situation. Belichick moved on from Bernie Kosar in Cleveland, and would have likely moved on from Drerw in 2002, assuming Bledsoe's numbers continued to trend in the direction they were going. Mo Lewis did BB a solid by moving the timeline up 12 months. People forget there were a whole bunch of folks clamoring for Michael Bishop.Bledsoe was a terrible fit for the BB/Weis offense
I think they were interested. How they actually stack-ranked him vs the other Qbs we don't know."The Patriots have shown interest, both publicly and privately, in a number of high-profile quarterback prospects ahead of the 2018 NFL Draft. You can add UCLA's Josh Rosen to the list.
As reported by NESN's Doug Kyed, the Patriots are showing interest in Rosen as they get ready for the draft. The first round kicks off next Thursday at the Dallas Cowboys' AT&T Stadium.
Rosen is widely expected to be drafted early in the first round, and has often been compared to fellow highly regarded QB prospects like Sam Darnold out of USC and Josh Allen out of Wyoming. If the Patriots' interest in Rosen were serious, they'd likely be required to package picks and move up in the draft order to have a chance at selecting him.
The Patriots currently hold the 23rd, 31st, 43rd, and 63rd picks in the first two rounds of the draft. They also own a third-round pick (95th), two sixths (19th and 210th), and a seventh (219th)."
Was the interest real? Who knows.
DW Toys
I don’t dispute they would be interested in Rosen at the right cost. He has potential.
I feel like there's a little bit of revisionist history going on here. It was a matter of time before Bledsoe lost his job. He didn't fit what they wanted to do, and wasn't exactly setting the world on fire, witness the 19/21 TD to INT ratio in 1999 and 17/13 in 2000. Not to mention the 8-8 record and 5-11. He was trending in the wrong direction, regardless of his contract situation. Belichick moved on from Bernie Kosar in Cleveland, and would have likely moved on from Drerw in 2002, assuming Bledsoe's numbers continued to trend in the direction they were going. Mo Lewis did BB a solid by moving the timeline up 12 months. People forget there were a whole bunch of folks clamoring for Michael Bishop.
Back to the Rosen issue, I don't see why he's being shown the love, but I am sure some of it has to be that people want to be the first to say SEE I TOLD YOU!!
I prefer to take a wait and see approach.
Is it though? I see the following QBs as top tier QBs that didn’t require sucking and getting a high pick.The "problem" for the Patriots is that the most common way of picking up a top level QB, sucking for a year or two and getting top draft picks, is anathema to BB, I think he is as proud of the Patriots's record of sustained success as he is the Rings, tanking just isn't in his DNA.
Are you sold on Rosen's commitment to the game? That's been a knock on him since day one.That MIGHT be true, but it is very unlikely that Jones will end up being a Patriot, while there IS a greater possibility that Rosen could become one.
If Rosen was coming out of UCLA THIS year he'd be mentioned in the top 3 QB's available in the draft. The Pats don't EVER have a chance at those kinds of guys. Now they can POSSIBLY get one on the rebound. Give the Cards a 2nd and one of the 3 third round picks we will have next year and see what 2 years of good coaching will do for an already talented player. Sitting for 3 years did JG a world of good and like a lot of Patriot FA's, he got PAID!
Because Kingsberry wants his own guy at quarterback. So if they do take Murray with the number one overall pick, they will probably end up flipping the 10th overall pick in last years draft for a 2nd and change. That is terrible.My question about Rosen is why is a QB-needy team like the Cards dumping him for an unknown like Murray? What did the Cards see that they didn't like?
It's true. Kingsberry said before he was coach that he would want him.Because Kingsberry wants his own guy at quarterback. So if they do take Murray with the number one overall pick, they will probably end up flipping the 10th overall pick in last years draft for a 2nd and change. That is terrible.
Are you sold on Rosen's commitment to the game? That's been a knock on him since day one.
Speaking of Steve Young, he really took at lot of heat or having that “monkey on his back” but his teams dealt with injuries at the worst times and had to face the Cowboys and Packers super teams.It's true. Kingsberry said before he was coach that he would want him.
Another reason 45 sacks. No way Murray has those numbers. He can move.
Also, the Fan base. They want to see a new offense and not what was served in 2018.
Steve Young was pretty bad his first year starting, yet led the Niners EVENTUALLY to a SB. I am sure the 49er fans wanted to ship him out of town.
Rosen has talent or he does not. BB's call.
Best chance to get a supposed first round talent at QB
DW Toys
I am until you can show me some quote from his time with the Cardinals that says something different. Larry Fitzgerald seems to think highly of him.Are you sold on Rosen's commitment to the game? That's been a knock on him since day one.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers that article.Pro football weekly called the patriots the team farthest away from the Sb before the 2001 season. They were 0-2 and looking worse than the previous years 5-11 when mo Lewis changed the future of the NFL
Joel BuschbaumI'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers that article.
Someone with internet skills should find it and either post it or give us a link. It would be good for some of the younger fans to ground them with what it was like to be a Pats fan BEFORE 2001.
BTW- IIRC the article named the Pats as the LEAST likely team to get to a superbowl in the next FIVE years. I can't remember who the other 4 teams mentioned as well. Though I can't remember the guys name (Stan Fishler or something?) he was a VERY respected analyst st the time and even the most rabid Pats fan would have had trouble contesting what he wrote in the spring of 2001. It looked UGLY for the Pats that off season....and then it all changed
| 10 | 754 |
| 19 | 1K |
| 19 | 953 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 8 - April 23 (Through 26yrs)











