The team has a surfeit of running backs on the roster. This had people wondering if the team would make one of them inactive every week. Now, because the team decided not to have Maroney active last week, you decide to post ignorant drivel. You have no idea whether or not Maroney was hurt to any real degree. In fact, Jordan was the running back listed as doubtful on the injury report during the week, not Maroney. It's possible that BB was playing games with the report. It's possible that Maroney was really hurt somewhat badly all along. And, it's possible that the team just decided not to put Maroney out there with a 'ding' he could have played with when it had 4 other running backs ready to go. As with seemingly everything else relating to football, you just don't know.
Looks like one long winded excuse to me. You can't just call a spade a spade. Did you say you where a business owner?
Do you make excuses for underperforming workers or products? Maybe a guy has a bad month, then you can chalk that up as a fluke, but if a guy is constantly doing the wrong things, you have to look at that as a trend. Is it Maroney's fault that he is injury prone? No, but it's part of the game. Don't try to tell me Maroney isn't injury prone. There is a record there. Same goes for his dancing at the line. I bet he works on that every single day, but again, it's part of his game (good or bad). At the end of the day in business or on the football field, show me the numbers. You give passes for certain situations, but when a trend of a constant problem keeps coming up, you have to take a look at the situation.
Belichick is famous for playing his players. Seymour as a fullback, hobbs on kr this year, why would he "hold out" Maroney so much? It's not what he is all about. Belichick is not a "kid's glove" type of coach. As for what I said about Jackson you are wrong, plain and simple. Jackson is a bust, and it was proven when not a single NFL team even looked at him after the cut.
Sey is nt what he used to be. One good performance, vs a bunch of rookies, on a bad football team means nothing. Lets count up all the games when he seemed to be a non factor, and did little to nothing. It's not his fault that he is hurt, but again, thats part of the game. Guys who can't get it done, shouldent get paid more than guys who can.
Nothing I said was "clueless", my argument is sound, and I'm not the only one who feels this way. I have not lied, or made claims that do not have history behind them. You refuse to look at the pats in a negative way, and that is biased.
