- Joined
- Sep 10, 2007
- Messages
- 9,986
- Reaction score
- 7,877
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Gwedd is under drinking age. The FBI would like to speak with you for soliciting young men.
It would seem if the building is paid for with taxes, then the people of that region (who support said taxes) should potentially have the right of first refusal for the tickets. That being said, how could you not sell out a home playoff game? Heck even Jacksonville could sell out for a home playoff game.
Common Sense should take over when the laws are so convoluted to support frivolous claims.
Gwedd is under drinking age. The FBI would like to speak with you for soliciting young men.
I agree. (That means duck.)Seems like another frivoulous case as with the Jest fan against NE back in 2007.
They are not discriminating against any type of person, rather simply restricting their sales to a certain region of the country. Now if they wouldn't sell to an admitted Denver fan who lived in Seattle, that would be a different matter altogether.
On a similar note, last year i tried to buy single game seats in Atlanta when the Sox came to town. The Braves, knowing that Atlanta is full of Sox fans, made is so that the only way non-season ticket holders could buy tickets for any of the three Sox games was part of a ten game ticket package which included stellar Monday night match-ups between the Braves and the Marlins, and such. I was so pissed!
I think maybe if it is a pubically built stadium, you might be able to get away with only having people who live in the tax base that paid for the stadium buy seats, other than that, it does sound like discrimination.
Yeah..... uh, I don't think so. However, I'll admit that my wife refers to me as her oldest child.
My ex-wife refers to me as the "defendant"...
The suit will be tossed out. Businesses can serve whomever they want to serve as long as they comply with any applicable laws regarding discrimination on the basis of religion, race or ethnicity. There's nothing in any law of which I'm aware that would add geography to that list.
The suit will be tossed out. Businesses can serve whomever they want to serve as long as they comply with any applicable laws regarding discrimination on the basis of religion, race or ethnicity. There's nothing in any law of which I'm aware that would add geography to that list....
"Your honor, my client is not racist, he just doesn't like Harlem: that they are black is just a co=incidence."
In banking it was called "Red lining."