“Honey Pie”. My least favorite “Beatles “ track without doubt. A reminder that even musical geniuses can turn out musical garbage especially when hubris gets in the way of good judgement. “So it’s true, pride comes before a fall. I’m telling you so that you won’t lose all. I’m a loser”. Sing it Brother John!
We will never get a good explanation because there never was one in the first place. Well, not a “best interest of the team “ or “for football reasons” explanation anyway.
No we never will and I wouldn’t have it any other way. I would not want an organization that airs its dirty laundry publicly.
And of course there was a reason.
It’s the Coach cultists who refuse to accept the facts. 4 months that have passed since SB 52. No credible, sourced reports have come out citing events or actions by Butler that demanded he be benched for the game. Just consider how unusual that is in our social-media times.
Who do you expect to throw him under the bus?
There have been reports including ones that say assistants came to Belichick saying he should be benched.
There are many credible reports (including from butler himself) that he wasn’t dialed in and had a terrible week of practice. He wasn’t working with the first team. I don’t think after a 2 week preparation period where you lost confidence in your starter’s head being in the right place and demote him it’s hard at all to understand that his meltdown prior to kickoff made the coaching staff feel he wasn’t ready to play.
You can dispute that all you want but it is very plausible and much more plausible than the other theories being expounded, including yours below.
[quuote]In the meantime, a NFL team general managed by a former Patriot executive and coached by a former player signed Butler to a 5 year, $61m with $30 m guaranteed contract. Apparently, Jon Robinson and Mike Vrabel weren’t too concerned with Butler’s ability to play or any character concerns that lead their former boss to bench him in the SB.[/quote]
Belichick also chose to make him the starter for 3 years. Why would one week and one action (disciplinary or otherwise) make the player unsignable?
Drop your blind faith folks. No mortal man deserves it.
There is no blind faith only common sense and a 17 year history of behavior.
Benching Butler was just a giant F-you to Bob Kraft for stepping on his precious authority and control of football operations by stopping his grand QB succession plan. Butler was just a pawn in Belichick ‘s vengeful control war with Kraft and Brady.
Now it becomes interesting.
You dismiss any other answer because there is no credible proof then you throw out this one that a) has been debunked and b) makes absolutely no sense.
John lynch is in record as asking for Brady and Belichick flatly says no way (duh). Belichick is on record saying there is no way you can keep both. What succession plan? B.B. (correctly) is riding out the GOAT. I’m sure he wished he could have kept jimmy around until that ride was over but not doing so had nothing to do with Kraft and everything to do with it being impossible.
You are taking an unsubstantiated and ridiculous rumor and then turning it into the result of it were true being that Belichicks response was “I am going to pick out a random player and bench him to reduce our chances to win the Sb. That will show him”. What could Belichick possibly gain by losing SB? How would benching butler send a message better than walking into his office and telling him?
Why not do it in an earlier round?
What did it accomplish?
Why would B.B. want to lose a Sb?
What has B.B. ever done in his career that would lead you to believe he would not value winning?
The answers to these questions show the fallacy of your viewpoint.