Looks like PI review is dead

[maust]

Given the way it went can't say anyone will miss it.

PressReader.com - Your favorite newspapers and magazines.

 

[jah]

I didn't really have a problem with it. I don't see how it's a good thing to make less stuff reviewable. People complained about not having the rule too.

Ultimately it doesn't really change much, but I see this as a case of people never being happy.

 

[Jangles]

I didn't really have a problem with it. I don't see how it's a good thing to make less stuff reviewable. People complained about not having the rule too.

Ultimately it doesn't really change much, but I see this as a case of people never being happy.

You could tell the refs were just going through the motions of reviewing it. They rarely if ever changed the call

 

[Froob]

Well if they aren’t going to overturn anything, it make sense.

 

[lancerman]

You could tell the refs were just going through the motions of reviewing it. They rarely if ever changed the call

Refs didn’t review it. NY did

 

[cmasspatsfan]

They need a sky judge that can call obvious missed penalties , much better than the way they handled that PI rule.

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

Chickenshit move. Entirely expected.

 

[Jangles]

Refs didn’t review it. NY did

Same difference

the whole thing was just to pretend they gave a ****

 

[oldrover]

To me, review needs an overhaul. Either:

1. Remove it entirely (don’t see that happening).
2. Remove it from the coaches, and just have it be an eye in the sky.
3. Keep the same system, but when the coach gets the call overturned, he gets another challenge. I’d prefer this one.

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

1. Remove it entirely (don’t see that happening).

No need to go further than this.

 

[QuantumMechanic]

Refs didn’t review it. NY did

And to be clear, the on-field refs review NOTHING. All reviews of anything are done by NY.