- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 996
- Reaction score
- 340
True. But let's say they increase the salary cap by $20 million (I'm throwing a number out there). The Pats would then have plenty of money (around $50 million) to re-sign Welker, add Lloyd, and then sign Mario Williams.
Except the additional money will have to come from somewhere. If it doesn't come from a reduced contribution to Player Benefits (by %) than it comes out of the owners pockets. If it is an allowed loan against the 2014 cap, then it comes out of the owners pockets until it can be repaid in 2014 (less "interest", of some kind, paid by the owners).
This doesn't benefit the Patriots, the $2 teams benefit far more than $10 teams. I'm, also, not sure Kraft wants to dig into his pocket for an extra $20 million, especially on short notice. Further, the Patriots success coupled with frugality shouldn't be reduced by allowing Pittsburgh and the Jets to survive over-spending (Jets) or a closed window due to age (Pittsburgh). Both the Jets and Pittsburgh would be financing themselves into future mediocrity by reducing their future years ability to spend money relative to teams who don't borrow from 2014. This assumes that the 2014 cap will be borrowed against in the first place. It's a bad idea. Let them go through a Team managed, and temporary, austerity program. Take their lumps and move on, for them it's a Correction.
As for the players, in general, they negotiated this in fair way and should live with it. That said, I would favor a few million dollar adjustment, in good faith, to the benefit of the players. I'm not sure they would reciprocate if the tables were turned. Just forget about a $20 Million adjustment though.












