- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 21,765
- Reaction score
- 15,958
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Obviously, Kraft is a moron. Nobody defending him. However, if he is guilty of enabling the sex traffic trade then the following must be true too?
Those of us who have ever used illegal drugs are culpable in all of the lives destroyed in the drug trade?
Hopefully that high horse enjoys its load getting lighter.
And the Patriots reputation is being dragged through the mud in the eyes of jealous fans and Bart f'n Scott? Pfft. That ship sailed a long time ago. A misdefukkinmeanor by a horny old imbecile would only embarrass me if my name was Jonathan Kraft.
This Patriots fan has the popcorn out and enjoying the circus.
This would seem to be the case. The question now is whether his public image to be rehabbed to any credible degree.Doesn’t matter. The reputation damage is done.
Robert Kraft may NOT be the only famous name in prostitution sting | Daily Mail OnlineMost people charged for the first time for soliciting a prostitute in Florida are allowed to enter a diversion program, said attorney David Weinstein, a former prosecutor. Kraft would have to perform 100 hours of community service and pay to attend an educational program about the negative effects of prostitution and human trafficking.
What sort of possible deal on a misdemeanor possibly could help him in the court of public opinion?
His defense is, nothing was illegal. Paying for a massage is not illegal. What does the video actually show? How was it obtained? Is it admissible? Cops do a lot of stuff that will never hold up in court, because the average Joe will cave because of the legal expenses. That’s why a lot of well-heeled clients get named and shamed and then have charges dropped when the prosecutors discover they are facing a very competent and well funded defense team. But the cops got their headlines, dissuaded other Johns, cut into the customer base, which is all they really want.Theoretically, what will be his defense?
My reference to the court of public opinion was looking at it from Kraft's perspective.Again, an answer there would be evidence dependent. And I don't really give a damn about the court of public opinion.
So I’m trying to make sense of a few schools of thoughts I’ve seen pop up.
Kraft is being linked directly to the trafficking piece, but nobody will definitively say if he was knowingly involved with it? Media keeps lumping the two leaving it ambiguous, which is of course the goal.
My reference to the court of public opinion was looking at it from Kraft's perspective.
Be honest guys. No homer replies.
How bad is this? Are we a laughing stock right now?
Be honest guys. No homer replies.
How bad is this? Are we a laughing stock right now?
That's the Jerry Rice excuse, except he didn't get caught on camera like our Bob Kraft did.The only thing Kraft denied was engaging in "illegal activities". He didn't deny being there.
My point is coming out in the press and stating the charges and that they have video evidence to prove it, and then if you fall short on those statements with someone with ultra deep pockets. That can cause a DA office to be torn apart with political longevity of said DA to be on the line. You just don’t throw bold statements like this up against a wall and see if it sticks. People’s lives can be ruined with false accusations like thisCharging someone with a crime and the charge not panning out isn't slander.
Be honest guys. No homer replies.
How bad is this? Are we a laughing stock right now?