Real fan 02
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2022
- Messages
- 23,817
- Reaction score
- 16,946
He owns the TEAM!!!!!!Because our owner doesn’t lead the players.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He owns the TEAM!!!!!!Because our owner doesn’t lead the players.
I'd be curious to see the reaction of posters here (most of, but not all of whom, are men) if they were told:I thought Mrs V was a firm believer, and IMO the Christian framework is all about love, forgiveness, and "turning the other cheek". Just co-parent the kid along with the Russini family. Life moves on.
I'd be curious to see the reaction of posters here (most of, but not all of whom, are men) if they were told:
Hey man, you should just co-parent the kid your wife had as part of a 5+ year affair and passed off as your own. You gotta work alongside your wife's boyfriend's family to make it work. Life moves on.
It feels like something really sad is going on to me. Whatever it is, he fathered one of her kids, or he is struggling with the scandal, or something else, I found the events of the weekend very strange. I still think this gets bigger and louder before it settles down.Unfortunately, it is impacting his role as HC of the NEP.
There is some smoke around the Pats sniffing out Ham Bone for a possible Vrabel replacement if he resigns which I don't think he will but you just can't say it's not a possibility.
Fair enough. But you never know it doesn't exactly sound out of this world.The only "smoke" is from the Daily Mail. I don't know if I am going to take a British tabloid known to peddle in fake gossip as anything but click bait. How would the Daily Mail have this info and not a Boston or at least U.S. sports publication that covers the NFL and Patriots and have close ties to the Patriots, Vrabel, and Tomlin.
Fair enough. But you never know it doesn't exactly sound out of this world.
If it were true, how would they know?There’s no way that’s true. The Daily Mail? Really?
I remember being told the same thing about the Aaron Hernandez story. It’s crazy until it’s not. He was at work today.This thread started off as laughable.
Now we're one more big hit (like one or both of Russini's kids being Vrabel's) from seeing Vrabel suddenly resigning.
But I'm told paying attention to this story is for high school girls and has nothing to do with the team.
Wow, this has to die down. No way he can go about like this for long.
This isn't going to court. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you are out in public and a hotel policy does not overrule the law. The hotel can punish the offenders by, for example, not allowing them to ever come back but a hotel policy won't hold the day in court.Couple Behind the Dianna Russini-Mike Vrabel Photos Could Be Headed to Court
Weeks after the controversy surrounding Mike Vrabel and Dianna Russini erupted, the guests responsible for it may suffer legal problems.www.essentiallysports.com
Interesting.
Apparently it is a crime in Arizona to knowingly photograph someone without their knowledge when they have an expectation of privacy.
This could end up on court.
Rossini’s next gig as plaintiff may be more lucrative than her career as reporter.Couple Behind the Dianna Russini-Mike Vrabel Photos Could Be Headed to Court
Weeks after the controversy surrounding Mike Vrabel and Dianna Russini erupted, the guests responsible for it may suffer legal problems.www.essentiallysports.com
Interesting.
Apparently it is a crime in Arizona to knowingly photograph someone without their knowledge when they have an expectation of privacy.
This could end up on court.
They were lounging in a public place in full view of anyone and everyone who happened to be present. There isn't a court in the country who would say they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel pool.Rossini’s next gig as plaintiff may be more lucrative than her career as reporter.
Wonder if sho can establish cause of action against Page Six for knowingly using illegally obtained photographs? It would be great to hang some responsibility on those who profited from illegal acts.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 14 - April 29 (Through 26yrs)











