- Joined
- Jun 17, 2000
- Messages
- 31,290
- Reaction score
- 47,950
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It could be that the Pats blocked them.So if it’s “just Twitter” and this is meaningless, why did someone bother to seek, find, and follow the other 31 team accounts, but not the Patriots?
You don’t follow the other 31 teams by accident, or stumble in that. There was a conscious, deliberate effort to follow all of the official accounts of NFL member teams … except one. In context, it’s absolutely meaningful.
Is there any doubt Troy Vincent is the one in charge of managing that account? I don’t think it’s a stretch to say the league’s review room is corrupt and I have little doubt Vincent is the guy spearheading it.
It could be that the Pats blocked them.
It's just Twitter.While that could be it seems unlikely. Maybe it's just me but I think that would involve Krafty Bob displaying a much bigger set when it comes to dealing with the league office than he ever has before. Certainly, other than perhaps Jonathan, no one in the Pats front office would block a league twitter account without RKK's blessing.
Nah, only 7% of Americans use Twitter. 99% of homes in America have a TV. People who use Twitter all the time assume that everyone uses as much as they do and that's just not the case.If it’s “just Twitter”, why is the NFL using “just Twitter” to host the official account for the review booth, which is used to disseminate formal information/explanations about their product?
Saying “it’s just Twitter” is like saying “it’s just a newspaper”, or “it’s just the radio”, or “it’s just TV”. It’s a modern form of media that is used to communicate information.
Either it’s all relevant, or it’s all irrelevant. I’ll go with the former, personally.
That Raiders out of bounds TD was egregious. I didn’t consider that it would not be overruled.I won't get into the conspiracies, but from the get-go this season, the officiating has not been favorable to us. Maybe it just stands out more because we're a so-so team, but it has seemed outrageous at times.
I don't think they were.I'm still wondering why they're playing prevent defense with over 2 minutes to go.
For me it's the total imbalance in offensive holding and PI callsI won't get into the conspiracies, but from the get-go this season, the officiating has not been favorable to us. Maybe it just stands out more because we're a so-so team, but it has seemed outrageous at times.
Scheduling for 2022 has been brutal. Not in terms of difficulty of competition but daysI won't get into the conspiracies, but from the get-go this season, the officiating has not been favorable to us. Maybe it just stands out more because we're a so-so team, but it has seemed outrageous at times.
I agree, I wanted them to replay that one with close-ups because I saw the bobble. The announcer kept saying what a great catch it was. I have no doubt gambling influences the NFL and the only remedy i can think of is play well enough (ie no stupid mistakes) to overcome the cheating by refs/league.I'm telling you - when the NFL replay office tells us that we don't see what everyone sees, the fix is in. This was just blatant. It was obvious to everyone that the receiver's foot was out of bounds.
BTW - watch the replay again of the Raiders' Mack Holland 2nd TD "catch" last night. At no point "going to the ground" did he have control. He bobbled it all the way down to the ground and then when he went to get up, he bobbled it out of his hands. This was more movement and an actual drop than Hunter Henry's catch against the Vikings. Yet the announcers never even commented on the bobbles while "going to the ground" and the NFL replay review rubber-stamped it.
| 35 | 5K |
| 146 | 7K |
| 149 | 8K |
| 4 | 243 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 29 - May 14 (Through 26yrs)











