Some of us knew we needed a 5th running back, even before the draft. We didn't have Eckel in mind. So in the end, we are forced to carry five running backs anyway. We could have picked up a veteran in free agency or a draftee at 28 or in the 3rd and been better off than depending on Eckel and Evans as running backs. How many of you are comfortable with Evans as the short yardage back, instead of say Crockett. Could you easily make a list of draftees that were available at 28 or in the 3rd, or with a trade from those positions? We basically had the choice of any running back picked after the 27th pick.
In the end, we chose to move cap money into 2008 and pick 28 and our 3rd. We did this because we jusdged that we had no significant need that could be addressed in free agency or in the draft. Some of us saw a need at running back. This is NOT hindsight. This was our mantra BEFORE the draft.
Of course, Maroney will be back at 100% next week, and we won't have any other running back injuries. And one of us will win the lottery this week. Couldn't we at least consider a Plan B? Or are we really fine with Faulk, Evans and Eckel.
IMHO, this is a risk the FO took, knowingly. We CHOSE to be thin at running back in order to carry a 7th safety on the opening day roster.
Maroney,Morris,Faulk,Evans,Eckel