yukon cornelius
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,878
- Reaction score
- 5,300
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.didn't see that coming; it was clear retaliation......
more inconcistency
Interesting
The league clearly is not assuming the intention was nothing more than a plain ole dumb hit.
It also is saying the taunting by JuJu was what sealed his fate (as the punishment states)
I agree. I think the league is ignoring those points this why its not a suspensionyeah, but that was pretty transparent and clear retaliation......if he truly wanted to separate the ball from the receiver he'd have but his helmet on the ball......that was a tit for tat kill shot......the way that game went, you could see it ramping up
I agree. I think the league is ignoring those points this why its not a suspension
It doesn't make sense.why though? that's what i don't get......the retaliation is worse than the initial act imho.......that's exactly what they DON'T want, is players taking retribution/punishment into their own hands
this league makes zero sense sometimes.......
noWasn't this the hit that led to the most severe injury of the 3 this week?
Wasn't this the hit that led to the most severe injury of the 3 this week?
No. That was self-inflicted. This didn't lead to any injury at all.Wasn't this the hit that led to the most severe injury of the 3 this week?
There was nothing dirty on the Shazier play. Shazier lead with his head on the play, and it unfortunately was very consequential.Wasn't this the hit that led to the most severe injury of the 3 this week?
I just saw that hit, he could have broken browns neck. Seriously that was a vicisous hit to the head and just as nasty as the one on burfect.didn't see that coming; it was clear retaliation......
more inconcistency