OK here is a football question that he might answer. Its also one I would like to ask him.
Bill, football is a game of cycles. Do you ever see the time that in the pro game that an offensive system like the Delaware wing T would come back into vogue? You would think with all the angle blocking and backfield deception that it would be effective, especially in areas where you have a physical miss match in the OTHER team's favor.
Then step back and watch him school the audience in a pure football question. The kind he loves
FYI- the Delaware wing T was a big favorite among HS and College teams in the 50's 60's and 70's. Later the I formation and the various read option formations became popular, and since the 90's the many spread formation have become the in thing.
The Wing T features a lot of angle blocking, pulls, double teams, and cross blocks. You rarely asked your linemen to have to take on a defensive lineman one on one WITHOUT an angle or a double team. In the backfield there were 2 backs. Mostly a FB behind the QB and a HF offset BESIDE the FB, usually away from the strength of the formation. The 3rd back was on the wing outside the TE, who could block or come back in motion on a reverse or counter. He could also be flanked out wide....hence the origin of the term Flanker. From this formation Quick hitters were the first running choice, though you could power a run as well. The point of attack was VERY defined for RBs. So for them it was hit the hole, make a cut, and go hard.
Personally I think with all the great talent on defense now days, this would be a very effective offensive system for the running and PAP games. It would definitely for offenses to stay at home, especially LBs.