- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 48,069
- Reaction score
- 29,558
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Don't apologize. I know EXACTLY how you feel. What was once a needed outlet after a game, has become almost an obligation. As you know it is hard to write something this long and not be overly redundant and restating the obvious. It used to be easy, now it takes a few hours....sometimes more.I haven't had a chance to read your entire post Ken, but thanks for keeping on posting them. Unlike you, I kinda have lost the passion for writing these post game write ups.
The way I see Goodell destroying the game I once loved with a passion has kinda taken it out of me. I look at the shoddy product on the field and see how they are just looking for ways to continue to go for cash grabs that will just cheapen the product is sad. The way that Goodell arrogantly has turned into the Don King of the NFL disgusts me. Still watch the games, but not with the same passion.
Sorry, off my soapbox now and thanks again.
I think the D took a kneeDefense
I don't disagree with that sentiment DB, but sometimes I can't help myself. I promise to try and do better.....tomorrow.Ken - Please stick to football. Your post was great. Adding the politics wasn't useful.
I don't disagree with that sentiment DB, but sometimes I can't help myself. I promise to try and do better.....tomorrow.
of course you never want to just one thing, but it just seemed like there was a lot more zone this week. BTW- I understand why that might be, give we were up against a running QB threat and being in zone offers more protection when the pocket breaks down.One reason you play a lot of zone against a QB like Watson is that it's much easier for your secondary to help when Watson takes off running, than it is if you are in man coverage.
Not sure if that was part of Patricia's thinking here but it wouldn't surprise me. Watson had a few good scrambles but didn't go crazy on the ground, something he's definitely capable of.
I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that man to man would leave the defense too vulnerable as it pertains to the QB and his running ability. I don't think there are too many "spies" who are going to keep up with Watson in a man scheme, but again, I'm certainly not claiming to be anything close to a defensive guru.With regard to the defense, didn't we used to play M2M against mobile quarterbacks, with someone responsible for the QB wherever he goes?
. I don't think there are too many "spies" who are going to keep up with Watson in a man scheme, but again, I'm certainly not claiming to be anything close to a defensive guru.
b. Alan Branch was still a no show as far as his impact plays go.
This game had me go back and watch the 2013 NO game. Similar feeling to this game. Only other wacky game like that was the Bears game back in 2002. They had no business winning but Brady brought them back.
Also, Watson is the real deal. I moved to South Carolina and have seen many of his games (Clemson is the closet thing to a pro team). The kid is mature, humble, confident and most importantly, a winner. He will get better and better.
2013 was full of those late game heroics. The drive to get the FG @Bills with multiple third & longs, the screwed up onside kick recovery @Falcons that almost came back to bite us, the Saints game, the Broncos comeback, the Browns onside kick recovery game.. we were one endzone Dola drop away from a last second win @Miami.. which would have given us HFA..
What a year..
I don't think you said anything wrong, in fact it was quite relevant to the goings on during this weekends games. There are 2 sides to that particular discussion.I don't disagree with that sentiment DB, but sometimes I can't help myself. I promise to try and do better.....tomorrow.
Don't apologize. I know EXACTLY how you feel. What was once a needed outlet after a game, has become almost an obligation. As you know it is hard to write something this long and not be overly redundant and restating the obvious. It used to be easy, now it takes a few hours....sometimes more.
The NYJFL has sucked the passion out of a LOT of fans over the last decade; and had this organization been run like 99% of the rest of the league's franchises, a lot of us would have given up on the NFL a while ago.
But this is what SHOULD be considered the model franchise, though behind closed doors perhaps it actually is, but still not in the broader public eye, and that is a shame. We have a game and a franchise that has made accountability a core principle, being attacked by a "president" who hasn't ever taken responsibility for ANY mistake he's ever made. His motto over the years has been, "never apologize, litigate". There is something terribly wrong with a guy who got SIX deferments when he was called to serve, waving the flage and claiming he's on the side of our fighting forces.
Damn it, now you got me ranting. I apologize to any and all for my personal opinions on a non-football topic
Diidn't we feel pretty much the same way about the defense, this time last season??? The more I think about it, one of the great simple truths that BB has come to realize is that every team is different. Usually at least 25% of the team is different. The chemistry is different. The skill sets are different, etc.At this time of year, I care about exactly 2 things: record and health. We're winning ugly, but it's September. If the defense still looks this bad in a month, then it'll be time to panic.
Diidn't we feel pretty much the same way about the defense, this time last season???
| 6 | 1K |
| 5 | 923 |
| 57 | 4K |
| 30 | 2K |
| 78 | 6K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











