So basically Brock Oswieler and his winning record as a backup is your ideal quarterback.
BTW you haven't explained anything, you've just quoted nonsensical cliches. And I'm not insulting your arguments, simply describing them.
It is the height of insanity to insist that winning football games is the only thing that matters and completely ignoring how games are won and lost.
And yes, I'll take a skilled YOUNG quarterback who loses a few games but knows how to play well and whose flaws seem fixable, over a mirage who gets carried by a good team
Seriously are you dense?
The Broncos won DESPITE Osweiler. You have to get your nose out of a stat sheet and watch football.
No one watching thought Osweiler was the reason Denver won and in fact they had a worse record with him, so he fits my argument better than yours.
I have explained in great detail how to login beyond a stat sheet and place value in what wins games. You don’t want to go beyond completion percentage.
Yes it is insanity to ignore how games are won and lost. Which is why I pointed out a winning team with a mediocre QB turned into a losing team with mullens. His stats that you love are not contributing to winning games. He does not make plays when it matters. That is what separates winning QBs and stat compilers.
With the same players around him Mullins loses when Jimmy g wins, and Jimmy g is a huge question mark.
You seem to think that this is about comparing a good an in a bad team to a bad qb on a good team. That’s all in your odd imagination.
It’s about evaluating mullens. That evaluation is that he takes a winning team and turns it into a losing team BECAUSE OF HIS PLAY. He has already been benched once for a slug (beathard).
If you think he can become a better qb because he can do under pressure situations what he does against a soft defense protecting a lead ( one it got because of how mullens played so far in the game) then you might throw a late round pick and have him compete to be your back up. But nothing he has done on the nfl comes close to showing you can make him your starter and win with him.
So other than making a straw man argument and trying to claim that brock
Osweiler going 5-2 on a 12-4 team (that’s was 7-2 with a noodle armed washed up qb) is the counter argument to the argument that most important qualities in a win are not stats but situational play, making plays that win games and compiling stats after you put your team in a hole, never dig out but get pretty numbers throwing against a soft defense is irrelevant, do you really have any argument?
how many games have you watched mullens play?
how many times have you seen him take the field for a clutch drive? How many succeeded?
how many times have you seen him okay poorly, get his team in a hole then run up stats and never get back in the game?
This is how you evaluate a qb, not ooh look at the nice completion percentage, let’s make him our qb and teach him not to throw Ints, and surround him with a less talented team than the one he is losing with and pray.