aluminum seats
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2006
- Messages
- 10,440
- Reaction score
- 11,324
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He passed on him twice. What indicates he was interested?I feel like the QB position is changing, shifting I guess.
Like I said, I think even bill sees this pattern because he was interested in this guy.
Look around the league, there are way more "mobile" QBs that can throw. We face another this week.
Jules fumbling the ball was indeed the turning point.
We had them figured out by the second quarter and were going to take the lead when Jules fumbled the ball. Everything went to **** after that. It was a back breaker moment.
I am confident that with plenty of tape on them + the game in Foxboro, we would win. Hell, I think we could take them in Baltimore as well. I won't be easy either way, but if we can stay healthy, we can do it.
Their offense is very productive, but it is also quite simple. BB will figure something out. We probably won't stop them completely, but I am confident that we will slow them down enough to give the offense a chance... and there lies my biggest worry: the offense will need to sustain drives and control time of possession... AND END DRIVES WITH TDs! But defensively? We will figure something out.
It allows the WC team to get back home at a somewhat reasonable hr.Wth is the sf/ravens game at 1? Always tough for west coast teams to play that early in the East
I don’t think you are following. The way you defend the option is one defender has the qb and another had the pitch. You simply make sure the unblocked guy has the qb and plants him. You aren’t sacrificing anything, you are accounting for one of the 2 potential runners.
Well you still have to deal with a very good ol and 3 very good blocking TEs. Nothing is easy if you lose one on one battles and are overmatched.Sounds great.
If only it was that easy.
@Ring 6 what exactly are you disagreeing w? It's not opinion.Yes actually.
There's no evidence to support that claim at all.
In fact look at "bigger" QBs, most of them are banged up too.
You do take a defender out of coverage, no?I don’t think you are following. The way you defend the option is one defender has the qb and another had the pitch. You simply make sure the unblocked guy has the qb and plants him. You aren’t sacrificing anything, you are accounting for one of the 2 potential runners.
I think the Chargers Ravens WC game-tape needs to be absolutely dissected by every team in the league.
Lamar looked completely lost that day. No one else has come close to making him play like that since.