joejccva71
Rookie
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 3
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No more zone schemes. They simply magnify our deficiencies. Rush 4, high or Roberts on a delayed blitz. Play press man outside. Ryan rides the pibe in favor of Rowe, who sees safety help while matched up with the toughest cover. His 2 dpi calls were garbage. Get him on the field and let him do hus thing. We dont have the personell for that candy ass drop 8 zone nonsense. If High is dropping out 15 yards at the snap....wtf. Stupid ass scheme. Patricia shoukd ride a short bus to gillette all week after drawing up that abortion.
Accurate. I give an A+ for creativity but a D- for execution.Am I understanding this right that at one point last night we dropped 9 players into coverage only rushing 2??? Like I must be imagining that. Is that right?
Am I understanding this right that at one point last night we dropped 9 players into coverage only rushing 2??? Like I must be imagining that. Is that right?
Am I understanding this right that at one point last night we dropped 9 players into coverage only rushing 2??? Like I must be imagining that. Is that right?
Ryan did well last year because there was a decent pass rush.
Ryan is not doing well this year because they are not generating enough pressure on the Qb
Overall I've been ok with him as CB2 but last night there were bad matchups all over theplace for him.
It was just like the Super bowl.
They should have played more man
Coleman is horrible on the outside. I don't know why they continue to use him out there. He is another Arrington.
Just like Sb49, Ryan was scorched. The dude cannot play man consistently.
They should have played Rowe and Jones in the slot and more man vs those shifty WRs.
Bad game plan, bad choice for inactive bad tactics.
Rushing 4 was pointless, so why not drop everybody in coverage
Rushing 4 was pointless, so why not drop everybody in coverage
I don't know because they still sucked? lol
Not trying to be funny but yea even with 9 back there they still had two receivers open. Why not BLITZ? lol Like we barely blitzed at all.
Wilson was pressured on 44% of his dropbacks.
Coleman and/or Ryan needs to stay in the slot, let Rowe play outside. How much have we seen of Jones in the slot? Has he done well?
Id franchise and Trade ButlerThis D has no playmakers. None. They dumped their two best players and think they can get something out of players that have failed in other places. But this year they can't.
Can't have a plumber doing brain surgery. Just doing your job dos not work if you are not qualified.
This place is turning into an episode of Felger and Mazz.
Everyone thinks they know everything better than BB & co despite only being exposed to the team during matchdays, not knowing what happens everyday in practice. The reaction to a loss against the Seahawks makes you think we got raped KC-style or are barely at 0.5.
The ****ing team is 7-2, has a playoff ticket essentially booked and is about to go into 3 preseason games in the middle of November.
Sometimes I wonder how many of you actually want to see them fail just to be able to ***** about the coaching staff.
Rushing 4 was pointless, so why not drop everybody in coverage
It's really hard to call this soft as f#ck zone scheme "coverage". You could drop everyone into that BS and still have any QB find the guys settling into those holes. So frustrating.
| 34 | 3K |
| 33 | 3K |
| 15 | 1K |
| 9 | 3K |
| 17 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 8 - April 23 (Through 26yrs)











