- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 15,208
- Reaction score
- 12,977
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Just a feeling, house on the market etc. I could see him being an above average QB for many more years after he is no longer on the top which he seems to still be.Why do you think it’s Brady’s last year?
Not sure how we could fit him under the salary cap.
???
If he comes back for Game 13, the cap hit would be $2.9M. That would likely take an extension or two (at most). I suspect that this was gross, so the net cap hit would be $2.4M plus any incentives.
In any case, this shouldn't be part of our planning. He could certainly change his mind, or the team might.
could you give us a source. thanks.Has to be reinstated by trade deadline on Oct 30. (right after W8 game against the Browns) to be eligible to come back without passing through waivers.
could you give us a source. thanks.
Miguel and Bedard had said that the last date was right before Game 13 and that cap cost would be $2.9M.
Perhaps Gronk has to file papers by the trade deadline and can get waivers for a month, and then only count as a roster player for Game 13.
Not yet, he hasn't been caught sending out **** pics.Gronk is getting worse than Farve
Via Lombardi in June:
He says he needs to be on the active roster by the trading deadline. Maybe Miguel and Bedard talk about some kind of practice exemption but either way he needs to be off the retired list by the end of October to avoid the waiver wire (which the Pats would obviously not agree to do).
Via Lombardi in June:
He says he needs to be on the active roster by the trading deadline. Maybe Miguel and Bedard talk about some kind of practice exemption but either way he needs to be off the retired list by the end of October to avoid the waiver wire (which the Pats would obviously not agree to do).
I think you have a bad link there. Try this:
The GM Shuffle with Michael Lombardi and Adnan Virk | Is Gronk Coming Back to the NFL? | Cadence13
And as I posted in the other thread, I believe Lombardi is wrong and doesn’t understand the rule. The example he uses was for a player (Deion Sanders) who wanted to unretire and sign with the Raiders. The Redskins held his rights. They released his rights so he could sign with the Raiders, but then he became subject to waivers and was claimed by 5 different teams.
Because the link was showing up as a Halo engagement ring ad, at least for me. Sounds like it might be a problem with my phone.Not sure what makes you think I have the wrong link when it has Lombardi literally saying Gronk has to unretire before the trade deadline.
OK, so maybe I missed it but I have to ask:
Doesn't the whole CBD treatment thing make him ineligible to play in the NFL? Ie banned substance? (Something the league very much needs to change IMO).
Because the link was showing up as a Halo engagement ring ad, at least for me. Sounds like it might be a problem with my phone.