SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Here are the number of Receptions to RBs under McDaniels:
2005: 74
2006: 89
2007: 62
2012: 56
Here are the number of receptions to RB under O'Brien:
2009: 74
2010: 61
2011: 37
They both trend downward, but McDaniels still used the RB more than O'Brien. The reason for the trend downwards? In 2007, they Added Moss and Welker. In 2010, they added Gronkowski and Hernandez.
I think 50-70 receptions to RBs during the season, when you have the weapons of Gronk, Hernandez, Amendola, with the additions of Dobson, Boyce, Jones, Edelman and Ballard is about right..
Bolden is not PS eligible. He played in 10 games, including two where he played on STs but not offense, weeks 2 and 15.Took a minute to google my question and I do not know the answer.
Bolden was listed as being on the patriots for 10 games, but he only has game stats for 8. Not sure if this applies in his case, but if a player is on the 53 and not activated for game day does it count as an eligible game?
I also think alot of it has to do with situational play calling....Here are the number of Receptions to RBs under McDaniels:
2005: 74
2006: 89
2007: 62
2012: 56
Here are the number of receptions to RB under O'Brien:
2009: 74
2010: 61
2011: 37
They both trend downward, but McDaniels still used the RB more than O'Brien. The reason for the trend downwards? In 2007, they Added Moss and Welker. In 2010, they added Gronkowski and Hernandez.
I think 50-70 receptions to RBs during the season, when you have the weapons of Gronk, Hernandez, Amendola, with the additions of Dobson, Boyce, Jones, Edelman and Ballard is about right..