Ken, we NEED an impact SS and TE to complement Gronk VERY BADLY.
To me, going into the season with Dennard and Ryan at CB is not as big a worry as those other two positions.
Cmon Shmess, you should know by now that SS isn't even a position in the Pats defensive system. By definition the "SS" always plays to the "strong side" of the formation, or the wide field, or some other designation. The Pats don't often flop their Safeties.
In fact as passing games become more complex and fast, and coverage ability becomes more critical to all S's, the true "SS" is becoming a thing of the past. If you ask me, could the Pats use some more size back at S, I'd agree, but NOT if it means any concession to coverage ability.
As to the TE position. I agree that that's a need. A position were there are several low cost options available right now. Off the top of my head, Scott Chandler, Owen Daniel, etc And THEN we have the draft
BTW- I'm kind of shocked that you perceive the need of an "impact SS" whatever that is. Where does one go to get one? Who is even out there that would meet that need for you?
And how did you become one of those who need immediate gratification and can't wait for players to develop over time, The Seattle D took several years to take shape. You want to discard Harmon after one season in the league, and Wilson after one year of regression.
Cmon man. You're better than that.
As for the "sky is falling" crowd, name the other team in the league that is going to get 3 multiple all pro players in the off season (4 if you count Vince).
2 things to remember All the media calls for "going for it" are merely whines from guys who only care about their own self interests. If the Pats sign big names, they become easy stories for them to write about. If they don't there are easy stories to write bashing the Pats for not being aggressive.
Remember when the media and fans were all hot on the Pats because they signed Haynesworth and Johnson, who both flamed out. (and they never miss the opportunity to hypocritically condemn the Pats for the signings after the fact). They forget the signings of Carter and the other DE who helped the Pats to a Superbowl, that came in July and went completely under the radar
And since I'm well into rant mode. F those who keep up the rant that the Pats could have another Lombardi or 2 if they had only been more aggressive in FA. They would have had another 2 Lombardi's is Welker had caught the ball, or the ball bounced their way on any of the 4 fumbles,they had that night or Gronk hadn't be hurt. Or if Tyree hadn't caught the ball, or Samuel hadn't dropped the pick, or the refs had call Eli "in the grasp" or holding, etc etc. NONE of those things had anything to do with signing more FA's, Any 2 of them and the Pats have 2 more rings.
We are the fans of the best run franchise in ALL of sports, yet EVERY mediot and most of the fans all think they can do a better job. What a joke.
Sorry Shmess, for hijacking your thread for my little rant. I feel better now.