Bradybranch
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2017
- Messages
- 264
- Reaction score
- 287
And you just contradicted yourselfNever paid Welker, Jules big money either.
Randy got paid but he was, well Randy
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.And you just contradicted yourselfNever paid Welker, Jules big money either.
Randy got paid but he was, well Randy
Yeah ok nobody was saying that. You must not remember 2012 when Edelman was taking Welker's reps in 2 wide sets.I'd like to hate this trade but then I think about two #1 picks and two #2 picks...
So it's Dorsett's fault Ryan Grigson was a fool who reached entirely too high for a WR?
The point is there were people saying Edelman wasn't good because he didn't play.
Thurman Thomas kept Barry Sanders on the bench at Oklahoma State, was it because Barry sucked?
They've never drafted a wr on the 1st round so there is no track record at allThere any receivers left to sign? I hope we don’t use a high pick on one, Bill and co don’t have a stellar track record there. I’d rather they just snag a vet.
"On his case"? Yeah, THAT I believe.
Well, y'know, I don't actually watch the games. Or re-play plays with the DVR while the game is in progress. Or re-watch games, or watch the All-22 or any of that silly stuff.
Nope! All I do is look at stats, completely out of context! So, you obviously have me at a distinct disadvantage there, since you've "seen with your eyes."
Still, "padded stats loser" seems more emotional than "factual" to me.
Brady was never good at throwing bombs anyway.
Brady in his prime had a very good deep ball
Yet another sorry fan whose kicking cooks on his way out. Classless
I've been kicking him the entire time he was here.
I've been kicking him the entire time he was here.
This is a absolute steal for him and instead of focusing on if cooks was any good or not let's celebrate that bill sent him packing for more than his actual worth.
Kick a guy who put up 1100 yards 7 TDs and won us the afc championship game in just his first year in our offense at a young age of 24....man you must have high standards
So you would pay a complimentary WR $14m a year or lose him for a comp pick?
Yeah, this Rotoworld blurb struck me as wrong when I first read it. Not only did Waddle perform admirably as a pass blocker last season, he only "lost his job" to Fleming because of injury. Waddle's a better player than he's given credit for, but even if he performs well he's just going to walk in free agency with a big contract next season so he's not a long-term solution.
Realistically, Garcia's the best option for a long-term solution at tackle considering the weakness of this year's class. He was a very good prospect in a good tackle class last year. There are also some hints that the health issue was known to teams going into the draft, which is why he was drafted at the end of the 3rd rather than the top of the 2nd. With Cannon, the Patriots have had good luck finding value on top-40 talents on the offensive line who fall to the mid-rounds because of health flags. Wouldn't shock me if Garcia turns out to be Cannon Part Two.
Cooks was solid for the Pats. He played really well and the play he got knocked out in the SB...well...it was a bummer and I was yelling for him to get down but the guy was trying REALLY hard for extra yards.
Anyone denigrating the guy is a loser. He was really good for the Pats, period. Was he Randy Moss? Of course not. But he was really good. The team, right NOW, is worse off. But of course that doesn't make it a bad trade. It was a good trade.
We traded a QB at mid season who was not under contract the follow year. How much do you think a team would be willing to give up? Keep in mind the 49ers had give Garoppolo a record contract on top of giving us a top 50 pick.
No its not.
If you think that these aforementioned number are some coincidence youre sadly mistaken.
Almedola 71%
Gonk 65%
Lewis 91%
Burkhead 83%
White 77%
Dorsett 67%
Bradys completion rate is 66% - 2 out of 3 passes completed not because his weapons are in the Cooks range.
Cooks 57%
Hogan 57%
Are low end on totem pole, but Hogan doesnt cost much as a situational WR and had a down season in 2017.
No, he's not 96% of Moss or Gronk. But he is very, very good. I loved having him on the Pats and wish, all things being equal, that he'd remain here. But this was a very good trade for the Patriots, so I'm on board with it.
Not really. They didn't overpay Randy for the production he gave themAnd you just contradicted yourself
Had something turned up in the Combine med-check that we haven't heard about?
I don’t think that means they would never do it though. I don’t think there’s any hard rules with BB and co, all situational. Seems like the only high round receiver that worked out was Deion Branch. Most of our success is late in the draft.They've never drafted a wr on the 1st round so there is no track record at all
Those numbers aren't telling the story you think they are. The guys who work deeper on the field will obviously have lower catch percentages as those are more difficult plays and harder to catch throws
Granted, Cooks dropped a few short ones - everyone does. But using 57% catch star without context is laughably bad logic