- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 16,342
- Reaction score
- 7,623
Bottom line for me: both reports sound like they could be about the same conversations, filtered through multiple sources, with a bias to one side or the other.
1) The only way we could ever know what actually happened between Brady, Bundchen, Belichick and the Krafts would be to have been in the rooms when the conversations occurred and, even then, it's possible that we wouldn't know enough about their complex relationships to be sure what was being communicated. After those many years, body language and nuances of language would be in play that outside observers can't perceive.
2) It is believable that the five principals (TB, GB, BB, RK and JK) communicated to a small handful of people an overall perspective on what was said (not exactly what was said), which was then repeated a few times and ended up in a form that eventually got to Benedict and Wickersham.
1) The only way we could ever know what actually happened between Brady, Bundchen, Belichick and the Krafts would be to have been in the rooms when the conversations occurred and, even then, it's possible that we wouldn't know enough about their complex relationships to be sure what was being communicated. After those many years, body language and nuances of language would be in play that outside observers can't perceive.
2) It is believable that the five principals (TB, GB, BB, RK and JK) communicated to a small handful of people an overall perspective on what was said (not exactly what was said), which was then repeated a few times and ended up in a form that eventually got to Benedict and Wickersham.