LivinLovin&Breathin_Brady
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2011
- Messages
- 1,937
- Reaction score
- 538
My God can you read what people have written about this and absorb it?
There was no grounds to make it about guilt or innocence.
Volumes and volumes of law say that no one can dispute and arbiters judgment on guilt and innocence.
It is not legal to go to court to fight the arbiters decision.
Brady's team could only fight the process that led to that decision.
If goodell follows all of the rules of arbitration he could determine brady was Aaron Hernandez accomplice and ban him for life from the NFL and then if he followed the rules of arbitration his judgment in making that decision cannot be questioned in court.
Prove his innocence, without a shadow of doubt, and any ethical or moral judge would question the arbitration process and lift the suspension on any grounds, including being innocent of the crime or whether there was a crime in the first place.
All of the judges questioned the cellphone incident. Since Brady destroying his phone had nothing to do with labor laws and such, I'm going to assume it was on the grounds of proving whether he is entirely innocent or not.
Question:
How would the law of shop apply to this case, IF he didn't deflate balls? Does this not make him look more guilty?
Brady was supposedly suspended for lack of cooperation, rather than deflated balls. His lawyers advised him to"destroy" his cellphone and went as far to admit that he could've been more cooperative. If we were to consider this, couldn't one argue that his lawyers made him look more guilty than before and that he at least deserved a 2-game suspension for lack of cooperation?
The destroying of the cellphone is irrelevant to me, because Wells only wanted certain emails, texts and call logs from a certain date. Brady could've got this info from the phone company, he could've also filtered out any calls, text or info irrelevant to the case. He didnt do that. He gave them some stuff, but conveniently, couldn't recover the information from the time period of Wells' investigation. Perhaps there was nothing to hide and the missing data was convenient enough for Wells to make the NFL's claim, legit. What bothered me was Brady's testimony during the appeal, it sounded suspect. He claimed he didn't know what his assistant did with his old phones, yet he's concerned with privacy and such? Not buying it, it reeks of someone hiding something and it makes him look guilty.
My point: Brady's lawyers turned this into a labor issue instead of proving his innocence in the court of law. They did this because they felt that it was the best argument to "free Brady" because they can't prove his innocence and this made Brady look more guilty than he did in the beginning to me.
It's also funny that you bring up Hernandez, when he appears to be no more or less guilty of murder than Brady appears to be for deflating balls, so they might as well make Brady an accomplice. The jury found Hernandez guilty because he's a tatted up Puerto-Rican, who seemed indifferent to the incident, he associates with thugs and has gang ties. However, no weapon and no motive -- how can they find him guilty? The system is corrupt and people are still judging certain people by certain stereotypes, but in the end: Who are we to say, with certainty, that either party is innocent or guilty? Why are we more sympathetic to Brady than Hernandez?
Think about it.