Anfernee Jennings

[Ring 6]

OK

Are you saying that teams don't subscribe to PFF products. My only pint was that teams do so and have the information available as one of the many, many, many factors sued in evaluation.

I’m sure some do. PFF is a data source. There is simply no way that they really on PFF players grades. PFF is well known to not grade players effectively and use grading systems that are not consistent with the way real football people grade football players. The NFL didn’t stop grading film and take PFFs.

 

[TheRainMaker]

You are aware Chaisson had 5 sacks in 4 years in Jacksonville before getting 5 last year with the Raiders right?

And Jacksonville let him go, so what is your point? He is also fighting for a spot on his 4th team now.

 

[Ring 6]

And Jacksonville let him go, so what is your point? He is also fighting for a spot on his 4th team now.

My point is that if the best run defender we have isn’t going to cut it based upon his sack rate a mediocre run defense at the same position isn’t going to cut it with a similar sack rate.

 

[captain stone]

There should be room here for Jennings somehow. I didn't see anything from anybody else that was any better.

 

[dliverey44]

Is the general public still able to edit Wikipedia? I think that is the first reason that you should not use Wikipedia as a source.

 

[Real fan 02]

Is the general public still able to edit Wikipedia? I think that is the first reason that you should not use Wikipedia as a source.

You know that's a very good question you asked!

 

[dliverey44]

You know that's a very good question you asked!

Just looked at Anfernee Jennings on wikipedia and there is an edit button at the top right, so I assume anyone can edit it.

 

[Ring 6]

Is the general public still able to edit Wikipedia? I think that is the first reason that you should not use Wikipedia as a source.

If you follow the link you get.

As of 2021, PFF provides customized data to all 32 NFL teams, 102 NCAA FBS teams, 9 CFL teams, national/regional media (e.g., The Washington Post, The Athletic, ESPN) and sports agencies/agents

And the footnote links to PFF saying so.

It appears reasonable that “provides” means they give it to teams for free to be able to advertise like this. If not teams are paying about $100 a year.

 

[One-If-By-Sea]

If you follow the link you get.

As of 2021, PFF provides customized data to all 32 NFL teams, 102 NCAA FBS teams, 9 CFL teams, national/regional media (e.g., The Washington Post, The Athletic, ESPN) and sports agencies/agents

And the footnote links to PFF saying so.

It appears reasonable that “provides” means they give it to teams for free to be able to advertise like this. If not teams are paying about $100 a year.

All 32 NFL teams subscribe to PFF's data and tools, paying an annual fee of $150,000 each, according to Front Office Sports. This subscription grants access to PFF's proprietary player-grading system and other analytical resources. In total, the NFL teams collectively pay $4.8 million annually for this service, according to Front Office Sports.

 

[Ring 6]

All 32 NFL teams subscribe to PFF's data and tools, paying an annual fee of $150,000 each, according to Front Office Sports. This subscription grants access to PFF's proprietary player-grading system and other analytical resources. In total, the NFL teams collectively pay $4.8 million annually for this service, according to Front Office Sports.

All you have to do is look at their grading and how it’s done (example a qb gets a higher grade for an incomplete pass into tight coverage that a completion to a wide open receiver) to know teams aren’t ceded film review to these bozos.

 

[One-If-By-Sea]

All you have to do is look at their grading and how it’s done (example a qb gets a higher grade for an incomplete pass into tight coverage that a completion to a wide open receiver) to know teams aren’t ceded film review to these bozos.

You said: It appears reasonable that “provides” means they (PFF) give it to teams for free to be able to advertise like this. If not teams are paying about $100 a year.

Teams are paying PFF $150,000 a year. You were off by $149,900. My comment was not about the quality of PFF's product, just the price paid.

 

[Ring 6]

You said: It appears reasonable that “provides” means they (PFF) give it to teams for free to be able to advertise like this. If not teams are paying about $100 a year.

Teams are paying PFF $150,000 a year. You were off by $149,900. My comment was not about the quality of PFF's product, just the price paid.

And the source is PFF. Which they use in their advertising, now directed at fantasy sports bettors.
We are talking about an expense of 0.05% of the salary cap.
If you want to believe that means the NFL relies on PFF film review, feel free.

And about $100 is the cost of a subscription which gives you all of their rating data.

 

[One-If-By-Sea]

And the source is PFF. Which they use in their advertising, now directed at fantasy sports bettors.
We are talking about an expense of 0.05% of the salary cap.
If you want to believe that means the NFL relies on PFF film review, feel free.

And about $100 is the cost of a subscription which gives you all of their rating data.

None of that is relevant to my comment that NFL teams pay $150,000 each yearly to PFF according to Front Office Sports.