nextsuperstar
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
- Messages
- 728
- Reaction score
- 730
I have absolutely no idea why there needs to be three defensive backs beyond two corners and two safeties. Seven defensive backs then? Really makes no sense at all. Put in a third CB or even put in a Nickel Back. This is like saying, okay, now after we have our two tackles, two guards, and a center, let’s vote for three offensive linemen!
Yes, it seems like “Defensive Back” designation is reserved for those who the voters think won’t make the first team (so in other words, a Second Teamer). That is really, really dumb and makes no sense at all. I think Sherman was the consensus third best corner but he was passed over for first team by Humphrey and Peters, who made first team because voters thought they weren’t good enough to be First Team. Only the NFL can make this big of a mess out of an All-Pro team.
Meanwhile, the two voters who were stupid/homer-ish enough to vote for Peters and Lattimore over White and Sherman get to select the second team corners. The two most incompetent voters have the most power.
it’s supposed to represent how the league actually plays. Teams in the modern NFL generally spend less than fifty percent of the time in the base defense, accordingly more defensive backs should make team. Probably, instead of using the vague category of “defensive back” the AP should have used the category of nickel-back or had the writers vote for three CBs.
Flex might be a receiving back or third down running back. One might argue that McCaffrey was both the best running back this year and the best receiving back, so he probably deserved both slots. Though Henry got both the second team RB slot and the second team Flex slot and he wasn’t a great receiver. Probably Henry should be the first team RB, while McCaffrey should probably be first team flex.












