- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 33,990
- Reaction score
- 14,479
Okay, ejumicate me.
I read over an over on the Jets gameday thread how we SUCK at second-half adjustments... using as a case in point a game (the JEST) where we dominated the first half.
I can see one important adjustment, which wasn't that successful: make sure the punter has time to get the punt away.
Otherwise exactly what would we need to "adjust" after the Jets' first half against us?
Isn't it more on-point to say the JEST did make good second-half adjustments? Same is the case with the Colts last week, in combination with a number of ancillary meltdowns.
But how does one "adjust" from slaughtering a team, exactly? What is the point?
I'm all ears
I read over an over on the Jets gameday thread how we SUCK at second-half adjustments... using as a case in point a game (the JEST) where we dominated the first half.
I can see one important adjustment, which wasn't that successful: make sure the punter has time to get the punt away.
Otherwise exactly what would we need to "adjust" after the Jets' first half against us?
Isn't it more on-point to say the JEST did make good second-half adjustments? Same is the case with the Colts last week, in combination with a number of ancillary meltdowns.
But how does one "adjust" from slaughtering a team, exactly? What is the point?
I'm all ears