jboston19
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,066
- Reaction score
- 3,575
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Please stop sharing tweets with non-credible rando Twitter accounts. I beg of you. That user in particular is making crap up as they go and you’re falling for it every time. Not even credible media people have that much knowledge of the inner workings of the Patriots.
It is literally no different than one of us on this forum claiming that the Pats are trading for Watson or Garoppolo. Use some common sense please, or at least share tweets from verified users. Look for the blue checkmark. If they don’t have one, good chance of being fake.
Edit - Just for the sake of speculation, I would pass on that trade, rather have Gilmore. Also no way the Cowboys would do that trade either if we’re being honest here.
So did I but not to this extent. I think you’re reading too much into Bill not playing him at the end of the season. Belichick was right; playing him in those games would not tell him anything about Stidham that he didn’t already know.I saw it coming. I only said it about 300 times.
We can conclude based upon what he has done with stidhams playing time that it’s pretty easy to see what he thinks of him.
Trading into the top ten gets you closer to QB country. Don’t discount that.No thanks.
Just for speculation, but if this trade were to happen, I would do:
Patriots get:
-Gallup
-#10 pick
Cowboys get:
-gilly
-#15
Just for speculation, but if this trade were to happen, I would do:
Patriots get:
-Gallup
-#10 pick
Cowboys get:
-gilly
-#15
he broke the Jonnu Smith signing before Schefter did
He didn’t play him basically ever while we watch crap QB play.So did I but not to this extent. I think you’re reading too much into Bill not playing him at the end of the season. Belichick was right; playing him in those games would not tell him anything about Stidham that he didn’t already know.
Maybe, what he knows is Stidham has the talent to be a capable NFL QB but blew it big time last off-season preparing for his shot to win the job. That Stidham is still around is testament to that, or, I would argue, he’d have been traded to the Texans by now.
The raiders are trying to win. It’s not like they are the jets.He’s not a mediocre QB in my opinion, but that’s obviously subjective. Why keep a 29 year old QB if you’re doing nothing? Raiders are such a dogshit organization.
There was an article quoting Jordan Palmer, who is Stidham's offseason throwing coach, that Stidham's college preparation for playing the quarterback position in the NFL was one of the weakest he had seen. It may explain why Belichick stuck with Cam.So did I but not to this extent. I think you’re reading too much into Bill not playing him at the end of the season. Belichick was right; playing him in those games would not tell him anything about Stidham that he didn’t already know.
Maybe, what he knows is Stidham has the talent to be a capable NFL QB but blew it big time last off-season preparing for his shot to win the job. That Stidham is still around is testament to that, or, I would argue, he’d have been traded to the Texans by now.
I think you are referring to Curran's article. He didn't say that it was "the weakest he'd seen." Here is the actual quote you are referring to:There was an article quoting Jordan Palmer, who is Stidham's offseason throwing coach, that Stidham's college preparation for playing the quarterback position in the NFL was one of the weakest he had seen. It may explain why Belichick stuck with Cam.