- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 7,103
- Reaction score
- 10,740
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Now Onwenu is the longest tenured Patriot…..
plus the draftee who will come in the first 3 roundsRoom is getting thin:
DE/OLB:
- Dre'Mont Jones
- Harold Landry (coming off injury)
- Bradyn Swinson
- Elijah Ponder
Chaisson signed with the Pats for one year, and now signed with the Commanders for one year.Like others here, I'm confused and suspect something has to be coming.
Chaisson signed for low-mid money elsewhere.
Jennings wasn't expensive.
Tavai wasn't expensive.
Don't get me wrong: I think Jones is better than either of the edge guys - best traits of both and he's bigger and more violent.
But we've watched a couple of top LBs go for middling money. Something's coming.
Yes, I'm scratching my head here. For basically a backup's salary, you had a guy -- the only guy on the team -- who could set the edge. He played a lot later in the year. And he even showed us some new pass rush moves.This is perplexing considering that Jennings was the best at setting the edge and, when the Pats had guys go down on the D-line late in the season during games, Jennings stepped in and played some DT.
Guess that means I can kiss any hope of Rodriguez in the draft goodbye.
Jennings was expected to be gone before last off-season. He really doesn't fit. I'm sure Vrabel is glad that we kept him (and also that we brough back Tavai).Yes, I'm scratching my head here. For basically a backup's salary, you had a guy -- the only guy on the team -- who could set the edge. He played a lot later in the year. And he even showed us some new pass rush moves.
So wow -- what could they be thinking? That extra $4m is going to be taken by a backup.
In this case? Cutting dead weight.Da fuq we doin?!?
Maybe this clears the roadblock keeping him from the field?What do we think about Swinson? They liked him enough to not let him get poached, but he still couldn't get on the field.
Pruning. Not exactly cutting dead wood, but trimming guys who have shown what they are, pretty much topped out in their career arc, to make room for youngsters still on the ascent to continue with more chance to grow and show their stuff. Clears space for signing lots of developmental players in FA and as UDFA, as well as draft picks. I like it.Odd trend continues of cutting players who are decent depth options at positions they don't have depth at for immaterial cap space they don't really have an immediate need for - both Jennings and Tavai. Vrabel doing right by guys I guess to not string them along, but feels like our depth is weaker than it could be right now.
I believe they are aggressively pursuing help at all positions.Right, im okay with it if we are going to be aggressively pursuing help at the position. Sort of the boat i was in with diggs release and the wr situation
They will be at 67 players after they complete all their announced moves. That's still 23 spots left. UDFA (and picks) won't be signed for another month. Pruning isn't really needed at this point. There's no need to clear space for signings right now and who knows what the future holds - those signings may or may not be DEs. Just seems odd to me to cut Jennings specifically when he's the 3rd best player we have at a premium position that you usually rotate AT LEAST 3 guys at. Not saying I didn't expect him to end up cut, but this just seems odd timing to me is all.Pruning. Not exactly cutting dead wood, but trimming guys who have shown what they are, pretty much topped out in their career arc, to make room for youngsters still on the ascent to continue with more chance to grow and show their stuff. Clears space for signing lots of developmental players in FA and as UDFA, as well as draft picks. I like it.
Vrabes is very much a players’ coach. If he knows he won’t be keeping a player he’s going to cut bait right away. It’s only right to give his guys a chance to catch on elsewhere. Wouldn’t surprise me to see some no-name JAG FAs signed to replace some of the departures like Jennings. Vrabel knows Jennings well enough now to see what his ceiling will be here and is comfortable letting him go. IMWT.They will be at 67 players after they complete all their announced moves. That's still 23 spots left. UDFA (and picks) won't be signed for another month. Pruning isn't really needed at this point. There's no need to clear space for signings right now and who knows what the future holds - those signings may or may not be DEs. Just seems odd to me to cut Jennings specifically when he's the 3rd best player we have at a premium position that you usually rotate AT LEAST 3 guys at. Not saying I didn't expect him to end up cut, but this just seems odd timing to me is all.
I believe they are aggressively pursuing help at all positions.
I also believe that Vrabes, Stretch, and the rest of the staff define “help” differently than the posters on this board.
I think the staff looks much more at expected future performance, that is what they think they can get out of the players they’re coaching, than they look at past performance. So instead of spending lots of assets acquiring established monsters like Crosby and Hendrickson they’re spending assets including their time evaluating tangibles (size, measurable athleticism) and intangibles (work ethic, character, desire) trying to find prospects that will become the next monster contributors.
So far they’re off to a good start. And it’s lots of fun to watch.
If you fear you can't replace a guy like Jennings, then you'd have to look yourself in the mirror as a GM and ask what you are doing wrong? Jennings is lucky he even made the team last year.Da fuq we doin?!?
| 4 | 761 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 1 - April 16 (Through 26yrs)











