Recent content by Boogs

If Russini's husband wasn't standing by her and if a paternity test was done and 1 or both of those kids were Vrabel's, I think there was a strong chance that Vrabel would have stepped down. And these were "ifs" But with her husband "standing by her", even if it is all show, there will be no...

You could be right on any or all of that ^. Anything is possible in this bizarre situation Or he's doing the same thing, so it's okay if she does it. And or deals have been made to try to make this go away so a very public show (kissing) was done to try to make all this temporarily go away.

Probably because they rented a boat together when she was 7 months pregnant. But who knows how many other partners she had through the years?

Or as some have mentioned already, this may be an open marriage on both sides. And if that's true, he might not care either as you said. And that's the first thing that comes to my mind now after they made a statement with showing their recent public affection

That's what it leads me to believe. Because I couldn't see a guy taking damage from his wife's interviews + a 6 year affair and being okay with things

I don't see how it's not forced. Because of how Russini has belittled her husband through the years and then her having a 6 year affair on him. I think it's a show. And meant to make a statement. But he's willing to do it and it's his decision. But I do think this could control potential...

It doesn't really matter if it was forced. It is a statement though, so you're right.

Exactly. It changes a whole lot of things that potentially could go really wrong

It's a moral/immoral topic. So eventually the Bible or religious views will come into the discussion.

Again, what nonsense? So far you've only shown you are overly emotional when talking about him

TreyVeyon Henderson never said he's okay with adultery and he never said he hates gay people.

Because of this 6+ year long affair, it is possible that one or both of those boys are not biologically Kevin Goldschmidt's sons. That is simply looking at the facts. There is nothing wrong with saying that.

He's actually not wrong. If you think he is, then show us where specifically

Nobody said he has to disavow any kids.

It is true. Maybe you wouldn't want to know, but most guys would want to know if those boys are their biological kids