Conversely, kick return coverage was terrible. I know they were missing Schooler, but man, the Colts started every possession at the 40.
@manxman2601 - How can you notice something that didn't actually occur?
Kick 1- Indy 38 yard line (28 yd return)
Kick 2- Indy 31 yard line (26 yd return)
Kick 3- Indy 20 (39 yd return nullified by Offensive Holding)
Kick 4- Indy 30 yard line w/ penalty knocking them back to the 20
Punt 1 - Indy 9 yd line - No Return
Punt 1 -
Indy 44 yard line (27 yd return)
Punt 1 - Indy 8 yd line - No Return
Punt 4 - Indy 9 yard line - No Return
Punt 5 - Indy 38 - 8 yd return
Punt 6 - Indy 11 - 4 yd return.
Sorry, but this idea doesn't fly in regards to the Kick / Punt. Only 1 PUNT return gave Indy starting field position beyond the 40. None of the kicks gave them position beyond the 40.
The time that Indy had a starting field position where they started beyond the 40 were the 3 missed FGs. And that's not a coverage issue.
Missed FG 1 - Indy started from their 46 (56 yd attempt)
Missed FG 2 - Indy started from their 45 (55 yd attempt)
Missed FG 3- Indy started from their 39 (49 yd attempt)
So, that's 9 of 10 possessions where Indy didn't start beyond their 40.
The coverage units were much better than you're giving credit for.