All people say things that are dead wrong. You more than most. I don't have time to document all the stupid stuff you post. The difference between us is that I admit when I am wrong, and you are the idiot who keeps promoting fantasy.
Now this is where your dementia and lack of honesty comes in. We picked OT in 1 and ED in 2. Now read this slowly. I wish I could write it in crayon for you. By the time we picked in 3, Sadiq, Stowers, Boerkircher, Klein, Klare, Roush, Delp, and Kacmarek were already gone. This was unexpected, and a few huge reaches are in there. After we picked Raridon, Hibner, Joly, Bredeson, Sharp, and Endries were taken. For the 2nd time in this thread, which are just too stupid to understand, those drafted after Raridon are a total crap shoot or just trash. There was no difference between signing a UDFA TE and wasting a pick between rounds 4-7. We kept the pic and signed Tanner Arkin. Joly was the flyer who has potential, but the guy cannot block and in undersized. He does not fit what we need. He would in no way be a replacement for Hill. There is not a single TE in the draft after Raridon that fits what we have in Hill. Picking one would have have helped this team. What you refuse to acknowledge is that Hill's injury was predictable proving we had to draft two TE. Just stop it. It was a freak injury.
To claim it would have been better to draft two TE is just wrong. OL and ED were necessities in 1 and 2. We would have had to package picks to get a TE before Raridon. That would have been stupid, and that probably why you would have done it. You post stupid stuff.
The whole argument we had in the draft thread was about all these things. It was easy to see the good TEs were gone and the Pats would not waste a draft pick. You seriously cannot understand this. You just lie and change the topic. In fact, here is what will happen: You will totally ignore the points in this reply and be an idiot by responding about something not related. Its just what you do.