- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 16,481
- Reaction score
- 27,733
Not true.we could cut 10 of them tommorrow abd no one would notice
You definitely would.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Not true.we could cut 10 of them tommorrow abd no one would notice
Only Sadiq, Stowers and Endries had better 10 yard splits. And Stowers/Endries was only by 1/100th.
Don't know where the RAS disconnect came from for them.
Damn.....He was a sleeper I was hoping to land late. Both him and Thomas were supposed to be available in the 5th-7th rounds. Huskey is a good player.Jalen Huskey to the Jags
I wasn't a big fan of Thomas. Made spectacular plays but some pretty big boobs too, both in coverage and against the run. He didn't feel too Vrabel-like to me.Yeah it is.....Most of the draft boards had Jacoby rated in the low 200's which I also felt was way too low. He's a good player. I was hoping to land him in the 6th round.
The draft boards and/or the teams were way off. A lot of low rated prospects drafted way higher than expected.
171 plus 191 and 198 would get us to about 122.Yeah that’s a lot. I’m pretty confident the one 5th, three 6ths and one 7th will transform into something like one 4th and two 6ths.
I would have loved him in the 6th/7th round, develop him in the special teams pipeline to start with, see what he can do.I wasn't a big fan of Thomas. Made spectacular plays but some pretty big boobs too, both in coverage and against the run. He didn't feel too Vrabel-like to me.
He is a better pass catcher and route runner, while blocking is important as a TE it's not everything. I agree that all of those guys you mentioned are better blockers but I don't know if they have the receiving chops to become Drakes guy like HH has been.You do realize you just admitted to a guy being biased making an outrageous statement, right.
Raridon is a mediocre blocker. He's not close to being in the same class as Kacmarek, Roush or even Delp as a Blocker. So there is no way that Raridon is the best TE in the draft.
Usually bpsn just cuts to a commercial break when the pats pick is announced . It's a traditionThey didn’t show Branch announcing the pick? Lame if so
Not true.
You definitely would.
Blocking is the majority of what a TE does.He is a better pass catcher and route runner, while blocking is important as a TE it's not everything. I agree that all of those guys you mentioned are better blockers but I don't know if they have the receiving chops to become Drakes guy like HH has been.
A boring draft is often OK for playoff teams.Weird feeling…my brain says “good, solid draft “. But part of me says BORING. Lol.
I recall another TE who fell in his draft class b/c of his injury history. We landed him in the 2010 draft.Amazing draft. Eli Raridon is a first round talent without the injuries. Obviously multiple acl injuries a real risk, but love the pick in late 3rd. Follow ND closely. Solid pick.
I don't believe it's a "weak" draft. Just because there aren't the "blue chippers" that everyone get's a hard-on over doesn't mean it's weak. There is good depth at Edge, TE and the O-line.Considering where the Pats were drafting, and in a weak draft, you gotta love what the Pats have been able to do.
Looks like they got three contributors at positions of need.
Can you name any between 4/24 and 6/2 which is 100% down time for veterans.Freak injuries happen all the time.
If we flipped Boutte into a 4 and took Kyle Louis… I wouldn’t hate it.So the Pats got…
- Tackle depth this year and high-end right tackle of the future
- Violent edge capable of starting almost immediately
- 6’7” athletic tight end with TE1 potential after a year
Add an AJ Brown trade on top and they are cooking. Only holes left are, perhaps, guard and LB depth, and maybe a little more edge depth too.
| 20 | 2K |
| 42 | 1K |
| 748 | 25K |
| 20 | 370 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










