You imply if Hollins doesn't play Drake will have a 116 QB rating the entire year. That would be the 3rd greatest QB year of all time. Please.
....Based on a limited sample with no context. What was the down and distance of the plays Hollins was out? What was the defensive coverage? You are pointing to a stat based on no context.
It's 326 for my site.
You lose a ton of credibility by saying it. It's a statement made in a echo chamber. Saying Harry is more productive a player that Hollins is a joke. Extrapolating stats based on a limited data sample doesn't make a player better. He hasn't done it. How can he be better? Thats like saying a RB w/ 5ypc and 30 carries over 2 years and can't pick up the blitz is better than one who is 4ypc, picks up the blitz and has 150 carries and is in the league for 5 years. It's dumb.
No he isn't. Williams has a ways to go. Maybe some day.
...and said he is better than Hollins.
Explain what away? They averaged almost 28ppg with Hollins playing 68% of the snaps and is a key contributor. What is your problem?
Douglas has less yards. Less catches. Less catch %. More drops. Less 1st down success % .Not good on run blocking. There is a reason he plays less. He isn't as good.
We all want more Diggs but I don't think less Hollins necessarily makes that happen. If Boutte was avail maybe.
Diggs and Boutte yes. Williams and Douglas no.
It's relevant to his contract and has nothing to do with 2025. Brandin Cooks has played for 7 teams. So what?
You inferred, I did not imply. I simply showed the stats with him on the field vs off.
It was about 40% of the plays. That is significant.
All the other numbers are from my site so it would be consistent to use the same one. Instead you tried to insult me by saying I can’t do math. That’s beneath you, but I get why you did it.
It doesn’t affect my credibility at all to be discussing Hollins yards per route run and finding examples that are similar. It probably costs you a ton of credibility to just dismiss it. There was no extrapolating. It was the number for each. Harry’s was over 670 routes run. Perhaps you should wonder why you are touting a guy who couldn’t produce more per route than Harry instead of pretending the stat that Damond your argument is an insult. The insult is building a career where you are no more effective per route than NKeal Harry. As well as flipping out when it’s shown to you.
Williams hasn’t had enough opportunity yet but he is better receiver. I can’t believe you would argue Hollins is more talented than Kyle Williams. Wow.
I never said Harry was better than Hollins. I said based on how productive they are when running routes, they are very comparable.
Explain how Hollins was a plus and not a detraction (I’d accept comparative non factor) when the team does better when he isnt on the field.
You realize Douglas has less yards because he plays less. Per route he is about 25% better. Coaching error has Hollins playing more than him.
Someone has to take the 68% of snaps. Diggs is sitting 45% of them. He’s your best receiver. Keeping him off the field so Hollins can play is a mistake. Again I’ll take any of the 4 over him for those 68%.
Before this year Douglas 1.55 yprr, Hollins 1.07. This year Douglas 1.99 Hollins 1.60. Douglas has been 25% more productive this year and more than 40% more over their careers.
Hollins is a guy who runs a lot of routes and doesn’t get open very much, but if you keep putting him out there even his mediocre at best ability to get open results in some catches. Many other receivers would produce more. That is the story of his career.
It’s relevant to his team wanting him around. Cooks was traded FOR numerous times. Hollins was let go numerous times.
