- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 18,523
- Reaction score
- 28,560
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.10 am Ryan Cowden, VP Player Personnel ...
Hottest topic of the day? Or just "eh, they won't meet the Bengals asking price" - rumored to be asking for a 1st... sounds steep to me for a 31/32 year old guy...
thank you ... will update the post with the correct infoHendrickson is 30. He turns 31 in December.
I think it’s a huge need. Our edge rushers are mediocre at best and the depth is poor.I'm not a fan of going after Hendrickson at this point. He is going to be costly and I'm not sure how much he moves the needle this year on a team that's probably a couple years out of being a true contender. What does he have left in the tank for a new contract, I am guessing he probably has two good years left. If it were Parsons then yes without question because he is only 26 and he would be around for when they make a run. I would rather we see what's out there for linemen as teams start to cutdown. I would feel better if we could possible pick up a couple veterans that could help get us through this year, that's the area with the most need. Hendrickson would be an improvement but its not a dire need...just icing on the cake.
I disagree. It's nowhere near the top of the list for needs. Parsons all day, Hendrickson its a pass because of what he is going to want for a short window of time.I think it’s a huge need. Our edge rushers are mediocre at best and the depth is poor.
Why is the only transaction that posters favored is one near the top of our needs? Should we ignore all possible upgrades other than LG? Really?I disagree. It's nowhere near the top of the list for needs. Parsons all day, Hendrickson its a pass because of what he is going to want for a short window of time.
Is it your position that we should only bring in players on 5 year contracts? There may be lots of players who might be expected to help the team over a 2-3 year period. And yes, one year contract might be signed with players who might help us in 2025 (OG, CB, LB).I disagree. It's nowhere near the top of the list for needs. Parsons all day, Hendrickson its a pass because of what he is going to want for a short window of time.
What need are greater?I disagree. It's nowhere near the top of the list for needs. Parsons all day, Hendrickson its a pass because of what he is going to want for a short window of time.
There's a good chance that we're not going to be a very good team this year. That means a mid-round first pick. That might be worth more than a 2-3 year deal and break the bank salary for a great DE.Is it your position that we should only bring in players on 5 year contracts? There may be lots of players who might be expected to help the team over a 2-3 year period. And yes, one year contract might be signed with players who might help us in 2025 (OG, CB, LB).
Swinging for Parsons and Getting Hendrickson is meh, he may play at a high level for 2 seasons.There's a good chance that we're not going to be a very good team this year. That means a mid-round first pick. That might be worth more than a 2-3 year deal and break the bank salary for a great DE.
Yesterday they all came out after practice was done, Pats probably have a policy against reporters live tweeting at this stage of camp. So I’m not expecting to hear anything until noon, depending on how long practice goes.Are there any Actual practice reports
| 149 | 13K |
| 195 | 14K |
| 37 | 2K |
| 49 | 5K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)










