- Joined
- Mar 3, 2017
- Messages
- 6,736
- Reaction score
- 7,657
Again, there is no contradiction between "celebrating Bill's (or Tom's) contributions" on the one hand and taking note of his subsequent decline on the other. The fact that I can no longer lift a hundred- fifty-pound rock doesn't contradict that 15 years ago, I could. (Not a theoretical point. There's a damned rock in my yard I put there fifteen years ago, and it's on the far side of my septic system, so I can't use my tractor to move it, and I can no longer lift it by hand. I've been glaring at the damned thing for two weeks.Sic transit gloria mundi.)This might be what you think you're doing but reality is you guys have used the past few seasons as an excuse to disproportionately give more credit to Brady and simultaneously taking it away from Bill with no care for the other players and coaches who you also marginalize in the process. And no care for the fans who just want to be able to celebrate everyone's contributions.
The argument over whether Bill or Tom is more responsible for the dynasty is fun, I suppose, but ultimately the answer is, "Both were." It's sort of like arguing whether hydrogen or oxygen is more necessary to making water. Both are.












