lancerman
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 12,898
- Reaction score
- 15,780
Okay take Bill's closest peer in the modern era. Andy Reid. He has 19 seasons without Mahomes as a QB. Still better than BillJust do the same Math for everyone else if you want to erase 2/3s I don't know what value that list would bring but it would be equivalent.
And as far as credit goes for the Dynasty Brady was the QB that gets more credit. I'd probably say %21 Brady, %19 Bill, and %60 the rest of the players and coaches. That's what you Brady v Bill Nuts Os don't get you can't separate the two they are forever linked as a duo.
Brady won without Bill, Bill didn't without Brady. You can absolutely separate them on that basis.
Go step a further, if you replace Bill with Tomlin but keep Brady and the same roster, do they win multiple SB's? Absolutely. Reid? Absolutely. Dungy? Absolutely. Arians? Absolutely.
Does Bill do much better in Pittsburgh without a QB like Brady being excellent? Does he do much better in Indy? Idk because either he's having lopsided offensively driven teams or he's pissing off Peyton Manning by focusing more on building a defense. Maybe I could buy he wins an extra ring in Green Bay than McCarthy under the same circumstances.
But point is, Brady earned the benefit by proving he didn't need Bill to win. Bill didn't because he nosedived without Brady no matter what stage in his career.
In 2020, I would have given Bill the benefit of the doubt. I truly thought the prevalent narrative that Cleveland was just growing pains and a truly bad org. But the next four years proved that the winning was reliant on Brady and the culture was reliant on winning.
Are the two better together? Yeah. But one is greater than the other and means more apart from the other. 3 plus 7 still equals 10. That doesn't mean 7 isn't a much more significant part of that equation. Brady was the 7. Most coaches might be a 1 or 2 and we benefitted from having the rare 3. But that only gets you so far in this league.












