- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,550
- Reaction score
- 50,175
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
One whole yard... game changer
Feels like the playoff reseeding proposal was a league trial balloon to gauge reaction rather than something the Lions really wanted. The league probably told them to take it off the table for now.
Tush push survives.
One whole yard... game changer
Unfair play for the defense.Apparently the Pats were one of the 10 teams who voted to keep the tush push. Needed 24 votes to ban it, there were actually 22 votes to ban it.
Tush push remains legal, ban on pushing ball carriers fails
Ravens, Patriots, Jets and Lions among teams that voted against tush push ban
Me, I have a lot of respect for the Patriots position. Bill Polian got pissed the Pats DBs beat up the Colts WR during the 2003 AFC CG, so he led the “point of emphasis” movement instead of changing his team to offset the Pats strengths. Vrabel’s basically said we’re not banning a play just because we can’t stop it. Shows a lot of consistency with their position back then.
Tom Brady had a higher conversion rate for his career with runs on 3rd or 4th and 1 than the Eagles do with the tush push.Why the hell did Kraft not oppose the tush push. Just dumb.
Totally unfair for defense and huge advantage for eagles,
TBF Sebastian Vollmer did an early version of it on Brian Hoyer in 2009 against the Titans.Apparently the Pats were one of the 10 teams who voted to keep the tush push. Needed 24 votes to ban it, there were actually 22 votes to ban it.
Tush push remains legal, ban on pushing ball carriers fails
Ravens, Patriots, Jets and Lions among teams that voted against tush push ban
Me, I have a lot of respect for the Patriots position. Bill Polian got pissed the Pats DBs beat up the Colts WR during the 2003 AFC CG, so he led the “point of emphasis” movement instead of changing his team to offset the Pats strengths. Vrabel’s basically said we’re not banning a play just because we can’t stop it. Shows a lot of consistency with their position back then.
They weren't simply "playing defense" they were committing a penalty. Multiple consecutive instances of the same penalty is unsportsmanlike conduct.Also didn’t realize that the defense playing defense is “unsportsmanlike conduct”. Huh
I think that’s only if they were all intentional. Not easy to judge.They weren't simply "playing defense" they were committing a penalty. Multiple consecutive instances of the same penalty is unsportsmanlike conduct.
| 10 | 3K |
| 554 | 58K |
| 16 | 5K |
| 13 | 6K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











